. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.

Published in final edited form as: Health Educ Behav. 2017 Dec 28;45(5):790–799. doi: 10.1177/1090198117744242

Table 3.

Significant findings from logistic regression analyses comparing Hispanic/Latino background groups on cancer perceived risk and efficacy beliefs

Comp	Ref	Risk or Efficacy Outcome

		Exercise Risk		Alcohol Risk		Fruits/Veg Risk		Saturated Fat Risk		Everything Efficacy		Confusing Efficacy

		OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI
Mex – SD	Cuban – Miami	1.93	1.43, 2.61	0.47	0.33, 0.67	1.75	1.30, 2.36	---	---	---	---	---	---
	Dom – Bronx	1.99	1.36, 2.92	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
	PR – Bronx	2.03	1.37, 3.02	---	---	1.80	1.28, 2.52	---	---	---	---	---	---
	S Am – Chicago	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	4.04	1.96, 8.36
Mex – Chicago	Cuban – Miami	1.79	1.33, 2.40	0.53	0.37, 0.78	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Mex – Chicago	PR – Bronx	---	---	---	---	---	---	2.58	1.61, 4.14	---	---	---	---
Cuban – Miami	PR – Bronx	---	---	2.51	1.64, 3.86	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
	PR – Chicago	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	2.16	1.36, 3.42	---	---
	S Am – Chicago	0.26	.14, .47	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	3.94	1.91, 8.13
S Am – Chicago	Dom – Bronx	4.00	2.12, 7.58	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	0.29	0.13, 0.61
	C Am – Miami	2.87	1.54, 5.36	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	0.26	0.12, 0.55
	PR – Bronx	4.08	2.14, 7.81	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	0.23	0.11, 0.51
	PR – Chicago	3.83	1.94, 7.56	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Note. Only pairwise comparisons that were statistically significantly different are presented in this table (all ps ≤ .001). Comp = Comparison group; Ref = Reference group; C Am = Central American; Dom = Dominican; Mex = Mexican; PR = Puerto Rican; S Am = South American; SD = San Diego; Fruits/Veg = Fruits/Vegetables. For all models the Comparison group was coded as 1 and the Reference group was coded as 0.