Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 6;8:10271. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28558-9

Table 3.

Classification Results of Ephedra samples using discriminant analysis.

Origin Assigned species for Ephedra samples with 9 variables
E. sinica E. intermedia E. przewalskii Total Correct (%)
E. sinica 15 2 0 17 88.2
E. intermedia 1 15 0 16 93.8
E. przewalskii 0 0 5 5 100.0
Total 16 17 5 38 92.1
Origin Assigned origin for E. sinica samples with 11 variables
S-NM S-NX S-GS S-SX S-SHX S-XJ Total Correct (%)
S-NM 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 100.0
S-NX 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 100.0
S-GS 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 100.0
S-SX 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 100.0
S-SHX 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 100.0
S-XJ 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
Total 4 4 3 3 2 1 17 100.0
Origin Assigned species for E. intermedia samples with 14 variables
S-NX S-GS Total Correct (%)
S-NX 3 0 3 100
S-GS 0 13 13 100
Total 3 13 16 100