Table 3.
Classification Results of Ephedra samples using discriminant analysis.
| Origin | Assigned species for Ephedra samples with 9 variables | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. sinica | E. intermedia | E. przewalskii | Total | Correct (%) | ||||
| E. sinica | 15 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 88.2 | |||
| E. intermedia | 1 | 15 | 0 | 16 | 93.8 | |||
| E. przewalskii | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 100.0 | |||
| Total | 16 | 17 | 5 | 38 | 92.1 | |||
| Origin | Assigned origin for E. sinica samples with 11 variables | |||||||
| S-NM | S-NX | S-GS | S-SX | S-SHX | S-XJ | Total | Correct (%) | |
| S-NM | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100.0 |
| S-NX | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100.0 |
| S-GS | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100.0 |
| S-SX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100.0 |
| S-SHX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.0 |
| S-XJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0 |
| Total | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 100.0 |
| Origin | Assigned species for E. intermedia samples with 14 variables | |||||||
| S-NX | S-GS | Total | Correct (%) | |||||
| S-NX | 3 | 0 | 3 | 100 | ||||
| S-GS | 0 | 13 | 13 | 100 | ||||
| Total | 3 | 13 | 16 | 100 | ||||