Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 9;26(5):685–693. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2018.02.022

Table 2.

Recovery as accuracy studies of the proposed method of β-amyrin, β-sitosterol, lupeol and ursolic acid (n = 6).

Stand. added to analyte (%) Theor. conc. of stand. (ng/μL) Method I
Method II
β-Amyrin
β-Sitosterol
Lupeol
Ursolic acid
Conc. found (ng/μL) ± SD % RSD % Recovery Conc. found (ng/μL) ± SD % RSD % Recovery Conc. found (ng/μL) ± SD % RSD % Recovery Conc. found (ng/μL) ± SD % RSD % Recovery
0 200 199.91 ± 0.69 0.347 99.95 199.94 ± 1.21 0.608 99.97 199.83 ± 0.65 0.326 99.91 201.57 ± 0.41 0.204 100.78
50 300 298.94 ± 1.01 0.338 99.65 300.55 ± 1.96 0.652 100.18 300.69 ± 0.81 0.270 100.23 297.09 ± 0.52 0.176 99.03
100 400 400.56 ± 1.42 0.356 100.14 398.34 ± 2.71 0.682 99.58 398.31 ± 1.16 0.290 99.58 401.25 ± 0.71 0.178 100.31
150 500 496.13 ± 1.96 0.396 99.23 496.32 ± 3.49 0.703 99.26 499.04 ± 1.65 0.331 99.80 500.56 ± 0.92 0.184 100.11

Stand.: Standards; Theor.: Theoretical; Conc.: Concentration.