Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 17;26(7):1644–1659. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.02.012

Table 1.

Electrophysiological Characterization of HVPs during Ventriculogenesis In Vitro and In Vivo by Optical Mapping

Parameter NKX2.5- GFP Day 15+ In Vitro NKX2.5-GFP Day 30+ In Vitro NKX2.5-GFP 1+ Month Ex Vivo Kidney Graft ES03 Day 15+ In Vitro ES03 1+ Month Ex Vivo Kidney Graft
AP upstroke time (ms) 128 ± 19 (n = 3) 128 ± 24 (n = 3) 129.7 ± 11.5 (n = 3) 143 ± 9 (n = 3) 105.0 ± 42.4 (n = 2)
AP 50% decay time (ms) 73.5 ± 4.1 (n = 3) 103.5 ± 5.5 (n = 3) 93.9 ± 18.5 (n = 3) 252 ± 41 (n = 3) 151.6 ± 2.8 (n = 2)
APD50 (ms) 202 ± 24 (n = 3) 232 ± 30 (n = 3) 223.6 ± 25.5 (n = 3) 395 ± 48 (n = 3) 256 ± 45 (n = 2)
APD90 (ms) 374 ± 66 (n = 3) 454 ± 10 (n = 3) 378 ± 32 (n = 3) 491 ± 91 (n = 3) 304 ± 1 (n = 2)
Conduction velocity (cm/s) 2.08 ± 0.91 (n = 3) 2.41 ± 0.17 (n = 3) 2.19 ± 0.14 (n = 3) 3.35 ± 0.75 (n = 3) 1.89 ± 0.58 (n = 2)

Comparison of action potential parameters by optical mapping. The NKX2.5-GFP-labeled ESC line and ES03 cell line were employed for in vitro and ex vivo (i.e., kidney patch) analyses. Measurements were made during 1-Hz pacing.