Table 3.
The effect of surgery-induced weight loss on vitamin D status
Authors (year) | Study population | Surgery type/Intervention | Study design | Measurements | Average 25(OH)D change | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weight | 25(OH)D | PTH | |||||
RCT | |||||||
Aasheim et al (2009) [81] | n=60 obese women (n=42) or men (n=18) (20–50y) |
|
RCT | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations increased among gastric bypass patients (p< 0.001), but tended to decrease among duodenal switch patients (p=0.059) |
Intervention study | |||||||
Raoof et al (2016) [83] | n= 32 obese women |
|
Intervention study | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | vitD deficiency (<50nmol/L): Baseline: 47.7 ± 15.8 5-year follow-up: 47.1 ± 24.6 |
Costa et al (2015) [80] | n=83 obese women (n=67) or men (n=16) (≥25y) |
|
Intervention study | ✓ | ✓ | vitD deficiency (<20 ng/mL): surgery: 60.4% non-surgery: 16.6% |
|
Luger et al (2015) [70] | n=50 obese women (n=38) or men (n=12) (mean age 46y) |
|
Intervention study | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 3 fold higher risk for vitD deficiency over 12 months OR=3.10, 95% CI (1.01–9.51) p=0.048 |
Yu et al (2015) [69] | n=50 obese women (n=28) or men (n=22) (average age 47y) |
|
Intervention study | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | no significant difference between both groups. intervention: 29 ± 10ng/ml control: 22 ± 10 ng/ml |
Carrasco et al (2014) [71] | n=40 obese women (19–50y) |
|
Intervention study | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Gastric bypass: 20.5 ± 9.2 to 33.8 ± 9.7 ng/ml Sleeve gastrectomy: 26.2 ± 12.7 to 34.6 ±14.5 ng/ml |
Karefylakis et al (2014) [75] | n=293 obese women (n=243) or men (n=50)(40 ± 9.9y) |
|
Intervention study | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 65% vitD deficient (<50 nmol/L) |
Biagioni et al (2014) [73] | n=22 obese women (18–40y) |
|
Intervention study | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | significantly increased |
Beckman et al (2013) [72] | n=20 obese women (48 ± 2y) |
|
Intervention study | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | increase of +10 ± 2 ng/ml after 12 months |
Coupaye et al (2013) [74] | n=60 women (n=53) or men (n=7) (40.5 ± 10.3y) |
|
Intervention study | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 13.4 ± 9.1 to 22.8 ± 11.3 ng/ml (p,0.0001) Sleeve gastrectomy: 15.2 ± 9.5 to 24.1 ± 14.4 ng/ml |
Casagrande et al (2012) [76] | n=22 obese women (27.2 ± 9.6y) |
|
Intervention study | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | no significant increase pre-surgery: 11.7 (9.7–18.0) ng/ml 1-y follow-up: 15.7 (10.2–2.7) ng/ml |
Sinha et al (2011) [79] | n=73 obese women (n=75) or men (n=39) (39.2 ± 10.8y) |
|
Intervention study | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | RYGB or BPD/DS: 22.1 to 31.0 ng/ml GB: 20.3 to 33.0 ng/ml |
Pramyothin et al. (2011) [82] | n=17 obese women and men |
|
Intervention study | ✓ | ✓ | no significant increase in serum 25(OH)D were observed between baseline measurements (23.1 ng/ml) and follow-up after 12 months (26.2 ng/ml) | |
Carlin et al (2006) [77] | n=108 obese women (n=100) or men (n=8) (46 ± 9y) |
|
Intervention study | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 20 ng/ml pre-surgery to 24ng/ml 12 months post-surgery |
Sanchez-Hernandez et al (2005) [78] | n=64 obese women or men (45 ± 10.9y) |
|
Intervention study | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | normal (.50 nmol/L): 6.25 to 20.31% insufficient (25–50 nmol/L): 25.00 to 37.50% deficient (<25 nmol/L): 68.75 to 42.19% |
Abbreviations: 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; PTH, parathyroid hormone; vitD, vitamin D; PYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; BPD/DS, Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch; GB, gastric bypass; RCT, randomized controlled trial; y, year