Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun;6(11):199. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.04.36

Table 2. The benefits and harms of intensive versus moderate diastolic blood pressure control in adults with diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension.

Outcome Risk with intervention/comparator per 1,000 Attributable avoided events per 1,000 treated (95% CI) Relative measure of association; number needed to treat (95% CI) No. of participants (studies)
All-cause mortality** 45/71 NS RR: 0.63 (0.38–1.05) 1,971 (2 RCTs) (28,29,40)
Cardiovascular mortality** 27/44 NS RR: 0.63 (0.39–1.03) 1,971 (2 RCTs) (28,29,40)
Congestive heart failure* 38/39 NS RR: 0.98 (0.40–2.43) 470 (1 RCT) (28,40)
Major cardiovascular events, DBP ≤80* 44/90 Avoided 46 [15–77] RR: 0.49 (0.30–0.80); NNTp: 22 [13–67]# 1,000 (1 RCT) (29)
Major cardiovascular events, DBP ≤85* 68/90 NS RR: 0.76 (0.49–1.16) 1,002 (1 RCT) (29)
Any cardiovascular event* 63/60 NS RR: 1.05 (0.52–2.13) 470 (1 RCT) (28,41)
Myocardial infarction* 25/38 NS RR: 0.78 (0.38–1.61) 1,971 (2 RCTs) (28,40)
Stroke** 27/35 NS RR: 0.81 (0.49–1.33) 1,971 (2 RCTs) (28,29,40)
Neuropathy progression* 400/310 Excessive 92 [6–178] RR: 1.30 (1.01–1.66); NNT: 11 [6–174] 470 (1 RCT) (28)
Retinopathy progression* 300/340 NS RR: 0.88 (0.68–1.15) 470 (1 RCT) (28)

Population: adults with diabetes and elevated arterial blood pressure (DBP ≥90 mmHg); Settings: outpatient; Intervention: intensive blood pressure control (DBP ≤75–85 mmHg); Comparator: moderate blood pressure control (DBP goal 80–90 mmHg). #, favors lower blood pressure target; , favors higher blood pressure target; *, very low quality evidence; **, low quality evidence. CI, confidence interval; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; NNT, number needed to treat; NNTp, number needed to treat to prevent an outcome in one patient; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, relative risk.