Skip to main content
. 2018 May 9;293(27):10757–10766. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002499

Table 1.

Select MEC-10 mutations alter channel activity

Xenopus oocytes were injected with cRNA mixtures of MEC-4 A713T (MEC-4d), MEC-2, and MEC-6 in the presence of WT MEC-10 or individual MEC-10 mutants. Basal currents (before the initiation of LSS stimulation) were measured at −60 mV by perfusing oocytes with NaCl-110 TEV solution. At the end of each recording, 20 μm benzamil (50 μm for channels without MEC-10) was added to the bath to determine leak currents. n indicates the number of oocytes assessed for each group. Statistical comparisons of whole-cell Na+ currents measured in oocytes expressing WT MEC-10 versus mutant channels were determined with one-way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni test (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001; ns, not significant).

Mutation INa+ S.D. n p
μA μA
WT MEC-10 −2.52 2.49 92
No MEC-10 −4.28 2.92 84 *
G676R −0.72 0.30 14 ****
L679R −0.51 0.19 15 ****
G680R −0.59 0.18 15 ****
G684E −0.43 0.14 15 ****
A673C −4.08 2.81 15 NS
D674C −1.08 1.14 10 **
F675C −2.11 1.43 10 NS
G676C −2.14 1.56 11 NS
G677C −0.80 0.71 9 **
H678C −0.60 0.33 13 ****
L679C −0.96 0.96 11 **
G680C −0.52 0.15 10 ***
L681C −1.58 1.15 15 *
W682C −1.61 0.74 15 *
S683C −1.40 1.69 15 **
G684C −0.30 0.16 15 ****
V685C −1.52 0.57 10 NS
S686C −0.36 0.28 12 ****
V687C −1.86 1.04 10 NS