Skip to main content
. 2018 May 20;19(4):155–162. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12355

Table 3.

Comparisons of average MCS, AA, total MUs, and gamma passing rates between the PRO and PO plans for SBRT and SRS treatments

SBRT SRS
Rx 54 Gy/3Fx 50 Gy/5Fx Rx 25 Gy/5Fx
Algorithm PRO PO PRO PO Algorithm PRO PO
MCS 0.38 ± 0.08 0.51 ± 0.04 0.34 ± 0.08 0.51 ± 0.08 MCS 0.28 ± 0.07 0.38 ± 0.05
AA 927 ± 371 1184 ± 361 849 ± 375 1254 ± 469 AA 379 ± 143 507 ± 184
Total MU 5723 ± 1045 4151 ± 475 3388 ± 574 2241 ± 453 Total MU 1820 ± 600 1304 ± 473
γ(3%/3 mm) 97.9 ± 1.5 99.2 ± 1.2 96.1 ± 2.4 99.1 ± 1.0 γ(5%/1 mm) 96.1 ± 3.4 98.4 ± 2.0
γ(2%/2 mm) 94.8 ± 2.8 97.7 ± 1.2 91.1 ± 3.2 96.0 ± 2.2 γ(3%/1 mm) 90.6 ± 5.1 95.7 ± 4.6