Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 2;9:1410. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01410

Table 4.

Differentially abundant genera identified between the control and 3.0 g humic substances per day for solid associated microbes (SAM) on day 5, 10 and 15 and liquid associated microbes (LAM) on day 15 in a Rusitec fed a mixed hay – concentrate diet.

Relative abundance (%)
Genus Control 3.0 g HS/d LDA score
SAM d 5
Lachnospiraceae XPB1014 group 0.58 ± 0.04 0.16 ± 0.07 3.8
Succiniclasticum 1.59 ± 0.15 0.88 ± 0.28 3.7
SAM d 10
Escherichia/Shigella 0.02 ± 0.01 1.20 ± 0.49 3.8
Anaeroplasma 0.17 ± 0.10 0.90 ± 0.10 3.7
Veillonellaceae UCG 001 1.11 ± 0.04 0.73 ± 0.18 3.6
Ruminococcaceae UCG 002 0.32 ± 0.10 0.08 ± 0.02 3.5
SAM d 15
Fibrobacter 11.49 ± 1.31 4.89 ± 0.28 4.6
Ruminococcaceae UCG 010 0.16 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.02 3.7
Olsenella 0.18 ± 0.03 0.80 ± 0.25 3.7
Pseudobutyrivibrio 0.99 ± 0.07 1.34 ± 0.12 3.7
Ruminococcaceae NK4A214 group 0.35 ± 0.07 0.17 ± 0.05 3.5
Papillibacter 0.22 ± 0.05 0.09 ± 0.01 3.5
LAM d 15
Christensenellaceae R7 group 1.74 ± 0.23 0.56 ± 0.13 3.9
Succiniclasticum 1.71 ± 0.10 0.81 ± 0.32 3.8
Methanomicrobium 0.005 ± 0.005 0.84 ± 0.43 3.8
Prevotellaceae UCG 003 2.83 ± 0.30 1.80 ± 0.26 3.8
Schwartzia 0.46 ± 0.07 1.19 ± 0.33 3.8
Coprococcus 0.22 ± 0.03 0.02 ± 0.01 3.7

HS, humic substances; LDA = linear discriminant analysis. Bold text indicates higher abundance of genera. Values represent the percent relative abundance of each genus.