Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2017 Jul 11;158:378–396. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.008

Table 4.

Pairwise TOST, where we test the null-hypothesis that for the target overlap score for each row-method, trow, and the target overlap score for each column-method, tcolumn, trowtcolumn<0.98, or trowtcolumn>1.02.

Dataset: LPBA40
ART SyN LO LP LPC
LO N/A
LP N/A
LPC N/A
Dataset: CUMC12
ART SyN LO LP LPC
LO N/A
LP N/A
LPC N/A
Dataset: IBSR18
ART SyN LO LP LPC
LO N/A
LP N/A
LPC N/A
Dataset: MGH10
ART SyN LO LP LPC
LO N/A
LP N/A
LPC N/A

Rejecting the null-hypothesis indicates that the row-method and column-method are statistically equivalent. Equivalence is marked as ✓s in the table. We use Bonferroni correction to safe-guard against spurious results due to multiple comparisons by dividing the significance level α by 204 (the total number of statistical tests). The significance level for rejection of the null-hypothesis is α = 0.05/204.