Table 4.
Dataset: LPBA40 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ART | SyN | LO | LP | LPC | |
LO | N/A | ✓ | ✓ | ||
LP | ✓ | N/A | ✓ | ||
LPC | ✓ | ✓ | N/A | ||
Dataset: CUMC12 | |||||
ART | SyN | LO | LP | LPC | |
LO | N/A | ✓ | |||
LP | ✓ | N/A | |||
LPC | ✓ | N/A |
Dataset: IBSR18 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ART | SyN | LO | LP | LPC | |
LO | ✓ | N/A | ✓ | ||
LP | ✓ | N/A | |||
LPC | ✓ | ✓ | N/A | ||
Dataset: MGH10 | |||||
ART | SyN | LO | LP | LPC | |
LO | ✓ | N/A | ✓ | ||
LP | N/A | ✓ | |||
LPC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | N/A |
Rejecting the null-hypothesis indicates that the row-method and column-method are statistically equivalent. Equivalence is marked as ✓s in the table. We use Bonferroni correction to safe-guard against spurious results due to multiple comparisons by dividing the significance level α by 204 (the total number of statistical tests). The significance level for rejection of the null-hypothesis is α = 0.05/204.