Table 5.
Domain ratings of importance by respondent
Respondent | Domain | Mean importance rating | Post hoc comparisons | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient | Depression | 8.8 | A | |||||
Anxiety | 8.1 | A | B | |||||
Lack of emotional support | 7.4 | A | B | C | ||||
Social isolation | 7.1 | B | C | D | ||||
Limited social activity | 6.9 | C | D | |||||
Sleep problems | 6.7 | C | D | |||||
Sleep-related impairment | 6.6 | C | D | |||||
Unable to manage daily responsibilities | 6.4 | C | D | E | ||||
Concentration problems | 6.1 | C | D | E | ||||
Anger | 6.1 | C | D | E | ||||
Fatigue | 5.9 | C | D | E | ||||
Limited physical function | 5.8 | D | E | |||||
Pain behavior | 4.9 | E | F | |||||
Pain interference | 4.8 | E | F | |||||
Loss of interest in sex | 4.1 | F | ||||||
Alcohol use | 9.5 | A | ||||||
Alcohol consequences (negative) | 8.6 | A | ||||||
Alcohol expectancies (negative) | 7.5 | B | ||||||
Alcohol expectancies (positive) | 6.3 | C | ||||||
Alcohol consequences (positive) | 6.0 | C | ||||||
Clinician | Anxiety | 9.1 | ||||||
Depression | 9.0 | |||||||
Lack of emotional support | 8.5 | |||||||
Social isolation | 8.1 | |||||||
Anger | 8.1 | |||||||
Limited social activity | 7.9 | |||||||
Sleep-related impairment | 7.7 | |||||||
Unable to manage daily responsibilities | 7.7 | |||||||
Sleep problems | 7.6 | |||||||
Fatigue | 7.1 | |||||||
Concentration problems | 6.3 | |||||||
Pain behavior | 5.9 | |||||||
Pain interference | 5.9 | |||||||
Limited physical function | 5.6 | |||||||
Loss of interest in sex | 5.0 | |||||||
Alcohol use | 9.2 | |||||||
Alcohol expectancies (positive) | 9.1 | |||||||
Alcohol consequences (positive) | 9.1 | |||||||
Alcohol consequences (negative) | 8.4 | |||||||
Alcohol expectancies (negative) | 8.2 |
For the patient ratings of importance, means not sharing a common letter are significantly different (p < .05) in post hoc comparisons using the Šidák method for multiple comparisons. With multiple clinicians rating a variable number of patients, the standard errors for clinicians’ ratings are large, and most of the multiple comparisons are not statistically significant despite the mean differences