Table 3.
Results of regression analysis.
| Variables | Perspective taking |
Team innovative performance |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 | |
| Control variables | |||||||
| Center in Beijing | −0.40* | −0.31 | −0.06 | 0.18 | −0.05 | 0.19 | 0.18 |
| Team size | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.09 | −0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gender diversity | 0.53 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.01 | 0.34 | 0.16 | 0.17 |
| Age diversity | −1.44 | −1.58 | −0.20 | 0.76 | −0.44 | 0.42 | 0.44 |
| Tenure diversity | −0.30 | −0.05 | −0.21 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.19 | 0.17 |
| Main effects | |||||||
| Expertise diversity (ED) | 0.51 | 0.09 | 0.88 | 0.32 | 0.37 | ||
| Paradoxical leadership (PL) | 0.59*** | −0.04 | 0.32* | −0.04 | |||
| Perspective taking (PT) | 0.66*** | 0.60*** | 0.61*** | ||||
| Two-way interactions | |||||||
| ED × PL | 2.43** | 0.22 | |||||
| ED × PT | 1.85*** | 1.76** | |||||
| R2 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.42 | 0.20 | 0.50 | 0.51 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.05 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.37 | 0.13 | 0.46 | 0.45 |
N = 98 work teams.∗p < 0.05,∗∗p < 0.01,∗∗∗p < 0.001; two-tailed test. All regression coefficients are unstandardized.