Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 6;9(13):2308–2316. doi: 10.7150/jca.25155

Table 4.

Univariate Cox regression analyses for RFS and OS of BLBC

Variables OS RFS
HR 95%CI P HR 95%CI P
Age (<50 vs.≥50) 1.937 0.277-0.973 0.038 1.472 0.401-1.149 0.150
Tumor size, cm (≤2 vs. >2) 4.999 1.782-14.023 0.002 4.314 2.055-9.054 <0.001
Histological Grade (II vs. III) 1.105 0.599-2.040 0.749 1.235 0.753-2.026 0.402
Lymph node stage (N0 vs. N1-3) 1.932 1.490-2.504 <0.001 1.929 1.573-2.366 <0.001
Radiotherapy (no vs. yes) 3.606 2.043-6.364 <0.001 5.755 3.217-10.294 0.000
CD68+ in TS (low vs. high) 2.985 1.381-6.449 0.005 2.229 1.269-3.914 0.005
CD163+ in TS (low vs. high) 3.548 1.697-7.417 <0.001 3.975 2.200-7.180 <0.001
CD68+ in TN (low vs. high) 0.951 0.519-1.742 0.870 0.925 0.571-1.500 0.753
CD163+ in TN (low vs. high) 1.322 0.717-2.436 0.371 1.496 0.916-2.445 0.108

BLBC, basal-like breast cancer; TS, tumor stroma; TN, tumor nest; OS: overall survival; RFS: recurrence-free survival; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval.