Table 2.
Comparison of the proposed method based on MIP-SBSE with other analytical methods for the determination of β-agonists in pork sample.
| Sample pretreatment | Analytical method | Target analyte number | Matrix | Recovery (%) | Precision RSD (%) | LOD (μg/kg) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIP-SBSE | HPLC | 3 | Pork | 83.7–92.3 | 2.9–8.1 | 0.10–0.21 | [40] |
| SPE | GC-MS | 4 | Pork | 75.5–89.6 | 2.5–4.2 | 0.4–0.7 | [41] |
| SPE | UPLC-MS/MS | 4 | Pork | 65.5–109.1 | 6.6–15.4 | 0.1 | [42] |
| QuEChERS | LC-MS/MS | 10 | Meat | 73.7–103.5 | 2.7–15.3 | 0.2–0.9 | [43] |
| SPE | HPLC-MS/MS | 3 | Pork | 79.25–112.82 | 7.14%–17.80 | 0.13–0.15 | [44] |
| MIP-SBSE | HPLC-MS/MS | 6 | Pork | 75.8–97.9 | 2.6–5.3 | 0.05–0.15 | This work |