Table 5.
Logistic regression analysis assessing the associations between the HTGW phenotype and IFG + IGT for men and women.
| Phenotype groups | Unadjusted | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | P | OR | 95% CI | P | OR | 95% CI | P | OR | 95% CI | P | |
| Total | ||||||||||||
| NWNT | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| HTG | 2.69 | 2.06–3.51 | <0.001∗ | 2.69 | 2.06–3.52 | <0.001∗ | 2.16 | 1.63–2.88 | <0.001∗ | 2.07 | 1.55–2.76 | <0.001∗ |
| EW | 2.15 | 1.75–2.66 | <0.001∗ | 2.15 | 1.74–2.67 | <0.001∗ | 1.83 | 1.47–2.29 | <0.001∗ | 1.27 | 0.99–1.63 | 0.059 |
| HTGW | 3.23 | 2.60–4.02 | <0.001∗ | 3.24 | 2.59–4.04 | <0.001∗ | 2.38 | 1.86–3.06 | <0.001∗ | 1.68 | 1.28–2.21 | <0.001∗ |
| Men | ||||||||||||
| NWNT | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| HTG | 1.89 | 1.26–2.67 | <0.001∗ | 2.10 | 1.43–3.08 | <0.001∗ | 1.68 | 1.11–2.55 | 0.015# | 1.59 | 1.05–2.42 | 0.030# |
| EW | 1.91 | 1.31–2.62 | <0.001∗ | 1.96 | 1.38–2.79 | <0.001∗ | 1.65 | 1.15–2.38 | 0.001∗ | 1.12 | 0.74–1.71 | 0.586 |
| HTGW | 2.63 | 1.75–3.54 | <0.001∗ | 2.89 | 2.03-4.13 | <0.001∗ | 2.11 | 1.41–3.16 | <0.001∗ | 1.52 | 0.98–2.37 | 0.061 |
| Women | ||||||||||||
| NWNT | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| HTG | 3.58 | 2.46–5.23 | <0.001∗ | 3.47 | 2.38–5.06 | <0.001∗ | 2.80 | 1.87–4.17 | <0.001∗ | 2.75 | 1.84–4.10 | <0.001∗ |
| EW | 2.57 | 1.95–3.39 | <0.001∗ | 2.37 | 1.79–3.14 | <0.001∗ | 2.04 | 1.53–2.72 | <0.001∗ | 1.40 | 1.02–1.93 | 0.040# |
| HTGW | 3.91 | 2.93–5.23 | <0.001∗ | 3.57 | 2.66–4.78 | <0.001∗ | 2.65 | 1.91–3.69 | <0.001∗ | 1.83 | 1.28–2.62 | 0.001∗ |
NWNT: normal waist-normal triglycerides; HTG: normal waist-elevated triglycerides; EW: enlarged waist-normal triglycerides; HTGW: hypertriglyceridemic waist. Model 1: adjusted for age, gender, nation, and education. Model 2: adjusted for model 1, family history of diabetes, SBP, hypertension, TC, and HDL-c. Model 3: adjusted for model 2, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and BMI. #P < 0.05 compared with NWNT. ∗P < 0.01 compared with NWNT.