Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 25;2018:5861043. doi: 10.1155/2018/5861043

Table 4.

Surgeries, complications, and follow-up of subjects with posterior segment IOFBs.

Subject Primary surgery IOFB extraction route Additional surgery Complications Final VA Follow-up (months)
1 LC, PPV, SO Planar Retinotomy, SO (3 times) Glaucoma, RRD LP 42
2 LC, PPV Planar IOL implantation 20/25 35
3 LC, PPV, C3F8, Planar IOL implantation 20/32 26
4 LC, PPV, C3F8, Planar IOL implantation IOP increase 20/100 22
5 Anterior PPV Planar 20/20 22
6 Evisceration Evisceration Hydroxyapatite implantation NLP 22
7 LC, PPV, C3F8, Planar RGP IOP increase 20/100 20
8 LC, PPV Planar IOL implantation 20/32 13
9 LC, PPV Limbal RGP 20/40 9
10 LC, PPV Limbal SO removal IOP increase HM 8
11 Anterior PPV Planar NA 3

LC: lensectomy; PPV: pars planar vitrectomy; SO: silicone oil tamponade; RRD: rhegmatogenous retinal detachment; VA: visual acuity; LP: light perception; NLP: no light perception; HM: hand motion; IOL: intraocular lens; IOP: intraocular pressure; C3F8: perfluoropropane; RGP: rigid gas-permeable lens; NA: not available.