Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 May 1;136(5):498–504. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0649

Table 1.

Categorization of ROP Examination Findings Using Telemedicine vs Ophthalmoscopic Examination

Categorization Telemedicine, No. (%) (N = 1553) Ophthalmoscopy,
No. (%) (N = 1553)a
RSD, No. (%)
(N = 1553)
Grader 1 Grader 2 Grader 3
Zone
  I 170 (10.9) 146 (9.4) 171 (11.0) 132 (8.5) 165 (10.6)
  II 1382 (89.0) 1403 (90.3) 1375 (88.5) 1204 (77.5) 1272 (81.9)
  III 1 (0.06) 4 (0.3) 7 (0.5) 217 (14.0) 116 (7.5)
Stage
  0 533 (34.3) 891 (57.4) 752 (48.4) 713 (46.0) 643 (41.4)
  1 551 (35.5) 317 (20.4) 330 (21.2) 385 (24.8) 431 (27.8)
  2 368 (23.7) 224 (14.4) 353 (22.7) 321 (20.7) 341 (22.0)
  3 98 (6.3) 120 (7.7) 116 (7.5) 134 (8.6) 136 (8.8)
Plus disease
  None 1259 (81.1) 1161 (74.8) 1243 (80.0) 1390 (89.5) 1238 (79.7)
  Preplus 229 (14.7) 351 (22.6) 273 (17.6) 104 (6.7) 265 (17.1)
  Plus 65 (4.2) 41 (2.6) 37 (2.4) 59 (3.8) 50 (3.2)
Disease category
  No ROP 531 (34.2) 849 (54.7) 737 (47.5) 714 (46.0) 640 (41.2)
  Mild ROP 642 (41.3) 297 (19.1) 428 (27.6) 573 (36.9) 512 (33.0)
  Type 2 ROP 296 (19.1) 350 (22.5) 327 (21.1) 181 (11.7) 313 (20.2)
  Type 1 ROP 84 (5.4) 57 (3.7) 61 (3.9) 85 (5.5) 88 (5.7)

Abbreviations: ROP, retinopathy of prematurity; RSD, reference standard diagnosis.

a

Aggregated results from 5 different expert clinical examiners