Table 4. Comparative analysis of the primary outcomes.
| Measure | Group | Mean ± SD | Mean difference (95% CI); effect size (d) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrodermal activity (µS) | Pre’-Pre | 1st I-Pre | 2nd I-Pre | Post-2nd I | (a) (Pre’-Pre) vs. (1st I-Pre) | |
| (b) (Pre’-Pre) vs. (2nd I-Pre) | ||||||
| (c) (2nd I-Pre) vs. (Post-2ndI) | ||||||
| MI | −0.09 ± 0.22 | 0.13 ± 0.31 | 0.24 ± 0.56 | 0.10 ± 0.21 | (a) −0.23* (−0.46 to −0.02); d = − 0.81 | |
| (b) −0.33* (−0.63 to −0.03); d = − 0.77 | ||||||
| (c) 0.13 (−0.07 to 0.34); d = 0.33 | ||||||
| MI + AO | −0.06 ± 0.12 | 0.17 ± 0.26 | 0.23 ± 0.34 | 0.08 ± 0.11 | (a) −0.24* (−0.47 to −0.19); d = − 1.13 | |
| (b) −0.30* (−0.60 to −0.04); d = − 1.13 | ||||||
| (c) 0.15 (−0.05 to 0.36); d = 0.59 | ||||||
| CG | 0.06 ± 0.16 | −0.12 ± 0.19 | −0.15 ± 0.19 | 0.00 ± 0.10 | (a) 0.18 (−0.04 to 0.40); d = 1.02 | |
| (b) 0.21 (−0.09 to 0.51); d = 1.19 | ||||||
| (c) −0.15 (−0.36 to 0.05); d = − 0.98 | ||||||
| Mean difference (95% CI); effect size (d) | MI vs. MI + AO | −0.02 (−0.18 to 0.13); d = − 0.16 | −0.04 (−0.28 to 0.20); d = − 0.14 | 0.00 (−0.36 to 0.37); d = 0.02 | 0.02 (−0.11 to 0.16); d = 0.11 | |
| MI vs. CG | −0.15 (−0.3 to 0.07); d = − 0.78 | 0.25* (0.01 to 0.49); d = 0.97 | 0.39* (0.03 to 0.76); d = 0.93 | −0.10 (−0.03 to 0.24); d = 0.60 | ||
| MI + AO vs. CG | −0.13 (−0.29 to 0.32); d = − 0.84 | 0.29* (0.06 to 0.54); d = 1.27 | 0.39* (0.02 to 0.75); d = 1.38 | 0.08 (−0.05 to 0.22); d = 0.76 | ||
Notes.
*
p < .05.
**
p < .01.
TITLE
- SD
- Standard Deviation
- vs.
- versus
- (Pre’-Pre)
- Pre-Intervention Differences
- (1stI-Pre)
- Differences between First Intervention and Pre-Intervention
- (2ndI-Pre)
- Differences between Second Intervention and Pre-Intervention
- (Post- 2ndI)
- Differences between Post-Intervention and Second Intervention
- MI
- Motor Imagery
- MI + AO
- Motor Imagery and Action Observation
- CG
- Control Group
- µS
- Microsiemens