Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Infect Dis. 2010 Oct 15;202(Suppl 2):S278–S288. doi: 10.1086/655655

Table 1.

Summary of Studies on the Effects on Virologic Control and/or Disease Progression of Early Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) during Acute or Early Infection with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Followed by Treatment Cessation

Reference Year Study type Study details Outcome Net clinical effect
Rosenberg et al [30] 2000 Prospective observational 8 acutely infected patients who started treatment during acute infection, followed by structured treatment interruptions Short-term virologic control seen in 5 of 8 patients a median of 6.5 months after cessation of therapy (range, 5–8.7 months) Virologic control
Desquilbet et al [42] 2004 Comparison of 2 prospective observational cohorts 58 PRIMO cohort subjects who started ART within 3.5 months after acute infection (median time to treatment, 45 days) and continued ART for a median of 17.3 months with sustained virologic suppression, who were then followed for up to 3 years, compared with 116 untreated seroconverters in the SEROCO cohort Early treatment did not affect the viral set point 12 months after ART cessation, in the treatment group, compared with time-matched assessments in the no-treatment group No difference in virologic control
Kaufmann et al [43] 2004 Prospective observational 14 acutely infected subjects who started ART during acute infection, followed by structured treatment interruptions 8 (57%) of 14 patients maintained virologic control for 180 days: 6 (43%) of 14 for 360 days, and 3 (21%) of 14 for 720 days. There was no predictable way to determine which subjects would achieve control Limited virologic control
Streeck et al [44] 2006 Prospective observational 12 acutely infected subjects treated within 25 days for 24 weeks, compared with 8 untreated seroconverters All treated subjects achieved virologic suppression by 24 weeks (when treatment was stopped), but CD4 cell count and viral load outcomes at 1 year showed no difference between treated and untreated subjects No difference in virologic control
Hecht et al [45] 2006 Prospective observational International cohort of subjects with acute infection (n = 13) or early infection (n = 45) who received treatment for ≥12 weeks, compared with a deferred-treatment group (n = 337) Acute group demonstrated lower viral loads and higher CD4 cell counts 24 weeks after cessation of therapy; early group demonstrated persistent but decreasing CD4 T cell count benefit over time and loss of the viral load benefit by week 72 after discontinuation of ART Mixed outcomes
Lampe et al [46] 2007 Comparison of 2 prospective observational cohorts 385 subjects in the CASCADE deferred-treatment cohort, compared with 79 treated subjects in the QUEST cohort, who continued therapy for a mean of 2.6 years Viral load was <1000 copies/mL in 10.1% of CASCADE subjects 3 years after seroconversion and in 17.7% of QUEST subjects 24 weeks after treatment cessation Virologic control
Fidler et al [47] 2007 Comparison of 2 prospective observational cohorts 89 patients who started treatment within 6 months after acute infection (median time to treatment, 1.5 months) and received highly active ART for a median of 3.3 months, compared with 179 matched untreated controls in the CASCADE cohort Treated subjects showed a less steep estimated rate of CD4 cell count decline (decrease of 51 cells/mm3 per year) compared with untreated subjects (decrease of 77 cells/mm3 per year). There was no significant difference in viral loads between the groups 6 months after ART cessation Mixed outcomes
Steingrover et al [48] 2008 Comparison of 2 prospective observational cohorts 24 subjects who started ART during primary HIV infection, compared with 46 chronically infected subjects who started ART with a CD4 cell count of >350 cells/mm3; all subjects underwent a single treatment interruption Steeper CD4 cell count decline after treatment interruption in the chronic infection group over the first 4 weeks; no difference between groups from 4 to 48 weeks. The median time to viral rebound was shorter in the chronic infection group than in the acute infection group (4 vs 8 weeks); 2 (8.3%) of 24 subjects with acute infection maintained viral loads of <50 copies/mL for up to 48 weeks of follow-up Mixed outcomes
Pantazis et al [15] 2008 Prospective observational 348 subjects in the CASCADE cohort who started ART within 6 months after infection, compared with 675 subjects identified at seroconversion who had deferred treatment No difference in viral load set point between the early-treatment and the deferred-treatment groups; significant CD4 cell count benefit 6 months after treatment cessation in the early-treatment group, compared with the deferred-treatment group, but only for subjects who had continued to receive treatment for ≥12 months. The death rate was higher in the deferred-treatment group, largely owing to causes not related to HIV infection Mixed outcomes
Seng et al [49] 2008 Comparison of 2 prospective observational cohorts 170 treated subjects from the PRIMO cohort, compared with 123 untreated subjects from the SEROCO cohort Mean CD4 cell count was not significantly different in treated vs untreated subjects at 3 years after treatment cessation No CD4 cell count benefit
Prazuck et al [50] 2008 Prospective observational 20 subjects enrolled within 10 weeks of seroconversion and started on ART for a median of 2.3 years, compared with 18 subjects deferring treatment At 144 weeks of follow-up, 25% of the treated group maintained a viral load of <50 copies/mL (vs none in deferred group). The CD4 cell count decline was twice as fast in the untreated group, compared with the treated group, during the period after treatment cessation. Virologic control was maintained for 4–7 years of follow-up Virologic control and CD4 cell count benefit
Goujard et al [51] 2009 Prospective observational 223 subjects who started treatment within 3 months after seroconversion and continued it for ≥3 months and who stopped treatment for ≥12 months were studied to determine factors associated with virologic control 26 (12%) of 223 subjects maintained viral loads of <500 copies/mL after treatment interruption (median duration of treatment, 19.3 months; median duration of virologic control, 27 months). In 13 (50%) of 26 subjects viral loads were <50 copies/mL for a median of 42 months, and the median CD4 cell count was 946 cells/mm3 Virologic control
Volberding et al [52] 2009 Prospective observational 121 subjects were enrolled with acute infection (<14 days after infection) or early infection (14–180 days after infection) and started therapy within 3 days of enrollment; 73 subjects had virologic suppression for 1 year, followed by treatment interruption 40% of 73 treated subjects with acute infection or early infection sustained viral loads of <5000 copies/mL after 24 weeks of treatment interruption Virologic control
Koegl et al [53] 2009 Comparison of 2 prospective observational cohorts 100 subjects with acute infection who were treated for a median of 9.5 months, compared with 56 subjects with acute infection who had deferred treatment No difference in median viral load 12 months after ART cessation in the treatment group, compared with the median viral load 12 months after seroconversion in the deferred-treatment group; median time to CD4 cell count <350 cells/mm3 was 20.7 months after ART cessation in treated group vs 8.3 months after seroconversion in deferred-treatment group Mixed outcomes
Hogan et al [6] 2010 Randomized controlled trial 130 (of an intended 150) subjects randomized to start ART immediately and continue it for 9 months or to defer therapy The study was stopped early by DSMB because of more rapid disease progression in the deferred-treatment group; virologic data were inadequate to assess differences between groups in the viral set point Slower disease progression

NOTE. CD4 cell, CD4 T lymphocyte; DSMB, Data Safety and Monitoring Board; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.