Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 May 11;97(9):1487–1495. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.010

Table 2.

FA value comparison between the clusters within each ROI

ROI Cluster Mean Std Dev Std Err Lower 95% Upper 95% P value
R-CST A 0.53 0.08 0.02 0.48 0.59 <0.0001*
B 0.53 0.07 0.01 0.50 0.57
C 0.19 0.06 0.02 0.15 0.23

L-CST A 0.48 0.08 0.02 0.40 0.54 <0.0001*
B 0.45 0.05 0.01 0.43 0.48
C 0.17 0.05 0.01 0.14 0.20

R-Peduncle A 0.45 0.12 0.04 0.37 0.54 <0.0001*
B 0.45 0.05 0.01 0.43 0.47
C 0.17 0.05 0.01 0.14 0.20

L-Peduncle A 0.59 0.08 0.02 0.54 0.65 0.0056*
B 0.52 0.09 0.02 0.48 0.57
C 0.45 0.13 0.04 0.36 0.54

R-PLIC A 0.57 0.07 0.02 0.53 0.62 <0.0001*
B 0.56 0.06 0.01 0.53 0.59
C 0.16 0.04 0.01 0.13 0.19

L-PLIC A 0.60 0.12 0.04 0.52 0.68 <0.0001*
B 0.58 0.08 0.02 0.54 0.61
C 0.28 0.12 0.04 0.19 0.36

C: Cluster, N: Number of subjects;

*

Significant difference between the clusters (A, B, C) (P<0.05; ANOVA)

L-CST=Left cortico spinal tract; R-CST= Right cortico spinal tract; L-PLIC= left posterior limb of the internal capsule; R-PLIC= Right posterior limb of the internal capsule; L-peduncle= Left peduncle; R-peduncle= Right peduncle