Table 2.
FA value comparison between the clusters within each ROI
ROI | Cluster | Mean | Std Dev | Std Err | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R-CST | A | 0.53 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.48 | 0.59 | <0.0001* |
B | 0.53 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.50 | 0.57 | ||
C | 0.19 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.23 | ||
| |||||||
L-CST | A | 0.48 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.40 | 0.54 | <0.0001* |
B | 0.45 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.43 | 0.48 | ||
C | 0.17 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.20 | ||
| |||||||
R-Peduncle | A | 0.45 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.37 | 0.54 | <0.0001* |
B | 0.45 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.43 | 0.47 | ||
C | 0.17 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.20 | ||
| |||||||
L-Peduncle | A | 0.59 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.0056* |
B | 0.52 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.48 | 0.57 | ||
C | 0.45 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.36 | 0.54 | ||
| |||||||
R-PLIC | A | 0.57 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.53 | 0.62 | <0.0001* |
B | 0.56 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.53 | 0.59 | ||
C | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.19 | ||
| |||||||
L-PLIC | A | 0.60 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.52 | 0.68 | <0.0001* |
B | 0.58 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.54 | 0.61 | ||
C | 0.28 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.36 |
C: Cluster, N: Number of subjects;
Significant difference between the clusters (A, B, C) (P<0.05; ANOVA)
L-CST=Left cortico spinal tract; R-CST= Right cortico spinal tract; L-PLIC= left posterior limb of the internal capsule; R-PLIC= Right posterior limb of the internal capsule; L-peduncle= Left peduncle; R-peduncle= Right peduncle