Table 2.

Three-way (TASK MODALITY, POSITION, FEEDBACK TYPE) repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) results for event-related potentials (ERPs) in good learners.

	P2/N2	P300	P400/N400	LP
TASK MODALITY	F(1,33) = 1.848 p = 0.183	F(1,33) = 0.007 p = 0.934	F(1,33) = 0.145 p = 0.706	F(1,33) = 0.002 p = 0.961
POSITION	F(1.225,40.429) = 53.529 p < 0.001	F(2,66) = 48.283 p < 0.001	F(2,66) = 49.085 p < 0.001	F(2,66) = 34.706 p < 0.001
POSITION × TASK MODALITY	F(1.225,40.429) = 0.858 p = 0.429	F(2,66) = 1.930 p = 0.153	F(2,66) = 3.385 p = 0.040	F(2,66) = 3.387 p = 0.040
FEEDBACK TYPE	F(1,33) = 0.051 p = 0.823	F(1,33) = 10.480 p = 0.003	F(1,33) = 1.380 p = 0.249	F(1,33) = 0.461 p = 0.502
FEEDBACK TYPE × TASK MODALITY	F(1,33) = 0.052 p = 0.821	F(1,33) = 0.024 p = 0.877	F(1,33) = 0.083 p=0.775	F(1,33) < 0.001 p = 0.983
POSITION × FEEDBACK TYPE	F(2,66) = 0.264 p = 0.769	F(2,66) = 14.090 p < 0.001	F(1.668,55.045) = 19.064 p < 0.001	F(1.671,55.145) = 0.889 p = 0.400
POSITION × FEEDBACK TYPE × TASK MODALITY	F(2,66) = 0.901 p = 0.411	F(2,66) = 0.108 p = 0.898	F(1.668,55.045) = 0.548 p = 0.550	F(1.671,55.145) = 1.077 p = 0.338

TASK MODALITY, results for the main effect of task modality in ERPs. POSITION, results for the main effect of position in ERPs. FEEDBACK TYPE, results for the main effect of feedback type in ERPs. POSITION × TASK MODALITY, results for two-way interaction between position and task modality. POSITION × FEEDBACK TYPE, results for two-way interaction between position and feedback type. FEEDBACK TYPE × TASK MODALITY, results for two-way interaction between feedback type and task modality. POSITION × FEEDBACK TYPE × TASK MODALITY, results for three-way interaction among position, feedback type and task modality. Significant statistical results (p < 0.05) for the main effect or interaction are in bold.