Skip to main content
. 2018 May 7;193(1):73–83. doi: 10.1111/cei.13131

Table 2.

Statistical analysis of the end‐point titres on enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on the antigens as indicated

Immunogen mean (s.e.m.) Linker mean (s.e.m.) Adjuvant mean (s.e.m.)
CTP target
hCGβCTP54500 (14200)
n = 42
EDC 62 700 (20 900)
n = 28
Montanide 35 300 (10 700)
n = 14
RIBI 92 175 (41 200)
n = 14
GAD 38 700 (10 200)
n = 14
Montanide 35 500 (16700)
n = 7
RIBI 41 800 (7800)
n = 7
BAChCGβR68E
210800 (137300)
n = 42
EDC 255 500 (205 700)
n = 28
Montanide 22 900 (7700)
n = 14
RIBI 482 000 (409 700)
n = 14
GAD 121 300 (40 900)
n = 14
Montanide 56 800 (10 900)
n = 7
RIBI 185 800 (75700)
n = 7
hCG/hCGβ target
hCGβCTP 12600 (3300)
n = 80
EDC 14 800 (4900)
n = 52
Montanide 17 500 (8500)
n = 26
RIBI 12 100 (4900)
n = 26
GAD 8500 (2000)
n = 28
Montanide 2000 (400)
n = 14
RIBI 15 000(3100)
n = 14
BAChCGβR68E
26500 (3600)
n = 84
EDC 24 900 (4700)
n = 56
Montanide 25 300 (4600)
n = 28
RIBI 24 400 (8300)
n = 28
GAD 29 900 (2000)
n = 28
Montanide 24 900 (6300)
n = 14
RIBI 34 900 (9300)
n = 14

Data represent mean [standard error of the mean (s.e.m.)] of raw data.