Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 4;14:1157–1168. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S162898

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of studies included in the network meta-analysis

Study and treatment Study quality Study design Propensity score matching Child–Pugh score ECOG PS Vascular invasion Serum AFP ≥400 ng/mL (n) End point outcome used Toxicity ≥ grade 3 I2
TACE + sorafenib vs TACE or sorafenib alone 18%
 1. Choi et al,27 Korea; TACE + sorafenib (=164); sorafenib alone (n=191) High Retrospective Yes A/B: 119/45; A/B: 136/55 NA PVTT + extrahepatic meta 83; 104 OS, DCR Leucopenia: 6 vs 3; hand–foot: 29 vs 23
 2. Bai et al,28 China; TACE + sorafenib (=82); TACE alone (n=146) High Prospective non-RCT Yes A/B: 63/19; A/B: 163/59 0/1/2/3: 30/38/12/1/1; 0/1/2/3: 85/119/18/0/0 MVI + extrahepatic metastasis NA OS, DCR Hand–foot: 2 vs 0; diarrhea: 4 vs 0
TACE vs sorafenib alone
 3. Pinter et al,29 Austria; TACE alone (n=34); sorafenib alone (n=63) High Retrospective No A/B: 20/14; A/B: 28/35 0/≥1: 9/25; 0/≥1: 21/42 MVI + extrahepatic metastasis 8; 19 OS, DCR Leucopenia: 2 vs 1; hand–foot: 0 vs 2
TACE + 3D-RT vs TACE 0%
 4. Li et al,30 China; TACE + RT (n=108); TACE alone (n=108) High Retrospective Yes A/B: 102/6; A/B: 105/3 NA PVTT + extrahepatic metastasis 66; 61 OS, DCR NA
 5. Lu et al,31 China; TACE + RT (n=30); TACE alone (n=33) High Retrospective No A/B: 20/10; A/B: 21/12 NA PVTT + extrahepatic meta 12; 11 OS, DCR NA
 6. Koo et al,32 Korea; TACE + RT (n=42); TACE alone (n=29) High Prospective No A/B: 26/16; A/B: 17/12 0–2 IVCTT ≤1,000 ng/mL; 22; 14 OS, DCR NA
HAIC + 3D-RT vs HAIC alone 17%
 7. Chuma et al,21 Japan; HAIC + RT (n=20); HAIC alone (n=20) Moderate Retrospective No A/B: 15/5; A/B: 13/7 NA PVTT NA OS, DCR Leucopenia: 3 vs 2
 8. Fujino et al,19 Japan; HAIC + RT (n=41); HAIC alone (n=42) High Retrospective No A/B/C: 19/14/8; A/B/C: 14/18/10 0/1: 37/4; 0/1: 35/7 PVTT 464; 1,742 OS, DCR Leucopenia: 5 vs 6; thrombocytopenia: 5 vs 6
 9. Katamura et al,22 Japan; HAIC + RT (n=16); HAIC alone (n=16) Moderate Prospective No A/B: 12/4; A/B: 13/3 NA PVTT 184.8; 586.7 OS, DCR Leucopenia: 9 vs 3; thrombocytopenia: 6 vs 5
 10. Onishi et al,20 Japan; HAIC + RT (n=33); HAIC alone (n=34) High Retrospective No B: 16; B: 16 NA PVTT 575; 399 OS, DCR Blood bile increase: 3 vs 2; leucopenia: 15 vs 2
Sorafenib alone vs HAIC alone 0%
 11. Jeong et al,33 Korea; HAIC alone (n=21); sorafenib alone (n=20) High Retrospective No A/B: 10/11; A/B: 14/6 1/2: 19/2; 1/2: 16/4 PVTT + extrahepatic meta 12; 13 OS, DCR Neutropenia: 5 vs 0; thrombocytopenia: 6 vs 0; hand–foot: 0 vs 2
 12. Kawaoka et al,34 Japan; HAIC alone (n=136); sorafenib alone (n=41) Moderate Retrospective No A: 136; A: 41 NA MVI Median: 415.3; 136 OS, DCR Liver failure: 3 vs 0; hand–foot: 0 vs 2
 13. Song et al,35 Japan; HAIC alone (n=136); sorafenib alone (n=41) High Retrospective No A/B: 45/4; A/B: 47/13 NA PVTT + extrahepatic meta Serum AFP ≥200 ng/mL; 32 vs 51 OS, DCR Hematologya: 106 vs 0; diarrhea: 0 vs 13
SBRT + TACE vs SBRT 0%
 14. Kang et al,36 China; SBRT + TACE (n=71); SBRT (n=30) Moderate Retrospective No A/B: 48/19; A/B: 24/11 NA PVTT 27; 9 OS, DCR NA
 15. Sapir et al,37 USA TACE (n=84); SBRT (n=125) Moderate Retrospective Yes A: 84; 125 <2: 142/95; ≤2: 24; 25 PVTT NA OS, DCR Hypervolemia: 3 vs 1; GI and biliary: 2 vs 7
Pooled data 19%

Note:

a

Hematology in HAIC group: leucopenia (36), neutropenia (46), anemia (72), and thrombocytopenia (56).

Abbreviations: AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; DCR, disease control rate; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; GI, gastrointestinal; HAIC, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy; IVCTT, inferior vena cava tumoral thrombosis; MVI, macrovascular invasion; OS, overall survival; PVTT, portal vein tumor thrombus; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SBRT, stereotactic body radiotherapy; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; 3D-RT, three-dimensional radiotherapy; NA, not available; RT, radiotherapy.