Table 5.
Summary of performance characteristics of molecular assays for diagnosis of scrub typhus
| Target | Assay | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 56 kDa | Conventional PCR109–111 | 0–96 | 100 |
| Nested PCR18,20,49,80,81,83,96,109,110,112–119 | 16–100 | 88–100 | |
| qPCR120,121 | 65–73 | 100 | |
| 47 kDa | Conventional PCR110,111 | 3–7 | 100 |
| Nested PCR110,111 | 81–85 | 100 | |
| qPCR49,81,110,122 | 63–81 | 90–100 | |
| LAMP123,* | 52 | 94 | |
| 16S rRNA | Conventional PCR111,119 | 45–87 | 100 |
| qPCR124 | 52 | 100 | |
| GroEL | Conventional PCR111 | 66 | 100 |
| Nested PCR125 | 90.4 | 100 | |
| qPCR49,81,126,127 | 56.4 | 96.2 | |
| LAMP81,127 | 87.5 | 100 |
Note:
An evaluation done using 24 eschar samples from scrub typhus-confirmed cases showed sensitivity and specificity of 83.3% and 100%, respectively (Prakash, unpublished data, 2012).
Abbreviations: qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; LAMP, loop-mediated isothermal amplification; rRNA, ribosomal RNA.