Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Jul 1;108(1):92–100. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy079

Table 3.

Cause-specific hazard ratios for spontaneous delivery according to FADS gene variants in mother-offspring pairs from the GUSTO cohort.1

All ethnic subgroups2 Chinese Malay Indian

SNPs Minor allele Mm mm Mm mm Mm mm Mm + mm3

Mothers n=897 n=516 n=231 n=150
    rs1745464 (FADS1) G 0.89 (0.73, 1.09) 0.82 (0.62, 1.08) 0.82 (0.63, 1.06) 0.70 (0.50, 0.99)* 1.08 (0.77, 1.51) 1.06 (0.55, 2.05) 1.06 (0.79, 1.43)
    rs2727270 (FADS2) A 1.02 (0.83, 1.26) 1.14 (0.88, 1.49) 1.09 (0.83, 1.43) 1.44 (1.04, 1.99)* 0.93 (0.64, 1.35) 0.78 (0.48, 1.26) 0.89 (0.60, 1.32)
    rs174593 (FADS2) G 1.16 (0.96, 1.41) 0.97 (0.61, 1.55) 0.99 (0.76, 1.30) 1.17 (0.55, 2.48) 1.36 (0.97, 1.91) 0.97 (0.54, 1.76) 1.18 (0.90, 1.55)
    rs498793 (FADS2) A 0.94 (0.76, 1.17) 1.48 (0.90, 2.45) 0.81 (0.58, 1.12) 1.85 (0.59, 5.79) 1.13 (0.79, 1.61) 3.42 (1.64, 7.11)** 0.87 (0.68, 1.11)
    rs17156506 (FADS2) A 1.17 (0.92, 1.50) 1.49 (0.66, 3.34) 1.31 (0.93, 1.84) 1.97 (0.73, 5.33) 1.04 (0.71, 1.52) 1.12 (0.28, 4.56) 1.04 (0.66, 1.64)
    rs174450 (FADS3) C 1.11 (0.90, 1.37) 1.51 (1.18, 1.95)** 1.06 (0.82, 1.38) 1.44 (1.03, 2.03)* 0.95 (0.58, 1.53) 1.46 (0.90, 2.39) 1.48 (1.08, 2.02)*
    rs1000778 (FADS3) A 1.04 (0.86, 1.25) 1.35 (1.03, 1.78)* 0.93 (0.73, 1.20) 1.46 (0.98, 2.18) 1.09 (0.77, 1.54) 1.25 (0.77, 2.04) 1.38 (1.05, 1.83)*
    rs174455 (FADS3) G 1.08 (0.88, 1.33) 1.42 (1.11, 1.82)** 1.04 (0.80, 1.35) 1.33 (0.95, 1.85) 0.97 (0.63, 1.49) 1.40 (0.89, 2.2) 1.46 (1.08, 1.99)*
Offspring n=1100 n=626 n=277 n=197
    rs1745464 (FADS1) G 0.94 (0.78, 1.14) 0.77 (0.59, 1.01) 0.96 (0.76, 1.22) 0.66 (0.47, 0.93)* 0.94 (0.69, 1.29) 1.04 (0.53, 2.06) 1.05 (0.80, 1.39)
    rs2727270 (FADS2) A 1.06 (0.87, 1.29) 1.10 (0.85, 1.42) 1.28 (1.00, 1.65) 1.20 (0.85, 1.68) 0.80 (0.56, 1.14) 0.95 (0.63, 1.42) 0.78 (0.50, 1.23)
    rs174593 (FADS2) G 1.07 (0.89, 1.28) 1.33 (0.91, 1.93) 1.13 (0.88, 1.44) 1.87 (0.92, 3.79) 0.93 (0.68, 1.29) 1.16 (0.73, 1.86) 1.08 (0.85, 1.37)
    rs498793 (FADS2) A 1.04 (0.85, 1.27) 1.07 (0.68, 1.69) 1.03 (0.77, 1.39) 1.61 (0.60, 4.34) 1.08 (0.77, 1.50) 1.26 (0.61, 2.58) 0.94 (0.76, 1.16)
    rs17156506 (FADS2) A 1.10 (0.88, 1.37) 2.41 (0.89, 6.48) 1.18 (0.89, 1.58) 3.89 (0.54, 27.77) 0.94 (0.64, 1.38) 1.85 (0.59, 5.81) 1.11 (0.73, 1.68)
    rs174450 (FADS3) C 1.22 (1.01, 1.48)* 1.51 (1.20, 1.89)*** 1.27 (0.99, 1.61) 1.80 (1.31, 2.48)*** 1.29 (0.86, 1.94) 1.45 (0.96, 2.18) 0.94 (0.74, 1.20)
    rs1000778 (FADS3) A 1.15 (0.97, 1.36) 1.28 (0.98, 1.68) 1.10 (0.88, 1.37) 1.64 (1.10, 2.44)* 1.20 (0.87, 1.66) 1.12 (0.70, 1.77) 1.13 (0.89, 1.43)
    rs174455 (FADS3) G 1.17 (0.97, 1.42) 1.40 (1.11, 1.77)** 1.20 (0.95, 1.52) 1.65 (1.19, 2.30)** 1.29 (0.87, 1.92) 1.39 (0.93, 2.09) 0.94 (0.74, 1.19)

1

Values are cause-specific hazard ratios (95% CI) for the incidence of birth by spontaneous labor for heterozygotes Mm and minor allele homozygotes mm (as compared to major allele homozygotes MM). Estimates were assessed by cause-specific proportional hazards model. p-values: *<0.05, **<0.01, ***<0.001.

2

Models in all ethnic subgroups were adjusted for ethnicity.

3

In Indians, homozygotes for the minor allele were too few and were therefore combined with the heterozygote group.

4

rs174546 is in negative linkage disequilibrium with the other SNPs.