Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 10;13(7):e0200188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200188

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of included studies.

Study Design Location Patient Number Mean age Male HTN DM HD Smoking Mean stenosis Center volume Basilar artery lesions Stents system Follow-up Quality scores
years % % % % % % case/year % % months
Gomez 2000 RC USA 12 62.6 83.3 NR NR NR NR 71.4 12 100 Coronary stents 5.9 4
Levy 2001 RC USA 11 62.9 100 72.7 9 27.3 45.5 > 70 5.5 72.7 Coronary stents 4 4
Kim 2005 RC Korea 17 64 58.8 100 35.3 29.4 35.3 76.1 5.7 46.2 Coronary stents 17 4
Weber 2005 RC Germany 21 67 71.4 NR NR NR NR 92.3 11 40.9 Coronary stents 9 4
Yu 2005 RC USA 18 69 83.3 83 50 72 33 79.6 4.5 100 Coronary stents 12.1 4
Abruzzo 2007 RC USA 10 68.3 80 90 40 30 20 80.7 2.5 100 Coronary stents 31 4
Steinfort 2007 RC Australia 13 60 100 NR NR NR NR 67 6.5 38.5 Paclitaxel-coated stents 10.3 4
Fiorella 2007 RC USA 44 64.8 79.5 NR NR NR NR 82.5 7.3 NR Velocity, Duet, Tetra and Vision stents 43.5 4
Ralea 2008 PC France 12 62.6 66.7 91.7 25 100 25 80 2 50 Tsunami, INX, Cérébrence and Wingspan stents 15 4
Seifert 2009 RC Austria 17 65.9 70.6 NR NR NR NR NR 3.4 NR Coronary stents or self-expanding nitinol stents 12.7 4
Povedano 2010 RC Argentina 25 63 84 84 24 60 40 NR 2.5 32 AVE INX and AVE GFX; Cypher, Sonic, and Velocity; Express and Neuroform; Taxus Express; Herculink and MultiLink Pixel; and Wingspan stents 12 4
Jiang 2010 PC China 139 59 92.1 78.4 28.8 80.6 66.2 81 19.8 50 Wingspan stents 24.9 5
Li 2012 RC China 30 60.3 83.3 86.7 40 16.7 46.7 82.3 10 46.7 Wingspan stents 17.8 4
Wang 2015 PC China 88 62.6 75 77.3 52.3 50 34.1 82.2 14.6 40.9 Wingspan stents 29.3 5
Liu 2016 PC China 97 58.5 82.1 82.4 28.9 44.3 61.9 84.2 48.5 53.6 Apollo and Wingspan stents 1 5

RC, retrospective cohort; PC, prospective cohort; HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus; HD, hyperlipidemia; NR, not reported