Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 1;50(2):81–85. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2018.17233

Table 3.

Relative cell death values for the cisplatin/glibenclamide combination groups (Cis200: cisplatin 200 μM; G1, G10, and G50: glibenclamide 1, 10, and 50 μM, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001)

n Mean±SE Median (25%–75%) p* Pairwise comparisons
1 Cis200 72 0.591±0.017 0.619 (0.497–0.701) <0.001 1–5**, 2–5***, 1–7***, 4–7***, 1–6**, 3–6***, 1–3***
2 Cis200+G1 12 0.695±0.020 0.703 (0.648–0.737)
3 Cis200+G10 36 0.726±0.011 0.745 (0.685–0.769)
4 Cis200+G50 12 0.687±0.033 0.727 (0.590–0.770)
5 G1 9 0.233±0.048 0.177 (0.100–0.388)
6 G10 12 0.296±0.048 0.276 (0.153–0.439)
7 G50 23 0.274±0.038 0.231 (0.126–0.385)
*

Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks (median 25%–75%)