Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 18.
Published in final edited form as: Vaccine. 2018 Jan 10;36(52):8158–8164. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.009

Table 4.

Mean acceptability ratings for study materials, by study group

Intervention
(n=68)
Control
(n=73)
p Cohen’s d
Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Information quality
 The information was…
  easy to understand 4.72 (0.48) 4.42 (0.71) 0.005 0.49
  credible 4.49 (0.68) 4.38 (0.64) 0.36 0.17
  important 4.69 (0.50) 4.64 (0.48) 0.57 0.10
  accurate 4.51 (0.63) 4.32 (0.72) 0.08 0.28
  relevant to me 4.60 (0.55) 4.53 (0.60) 0.48 0.12
System quality
 I like how [materials] looked. 4.62 (0.52) 4.48 (0.63) 0.16 0.24
 It is easy to use. 4.57 (0.61) 4.56 (0.53) 0.90 0.02
 It loads all the text and graphics quickly. 4.57 (0.58) 4.64 (0.48) 0.43 −0.13
 It is easy to go back and forth between pages. 4.53 (0.66) 4.38 (0.66) 0.19 0.23
 It is easy to locate information. 4.54 (0.56) 4.41 (0.60) 0.17 0.22
Usefulness
 It improved my ability to make healthier choices. 4.46 (0.63) 4.37 (0.66) 0.43 0.14

Note. HPV= human papillomavirus; SD=standard deviation

All items were on a 5-point agree-disagree scale (1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree). P-values represent results from independent samples t-tests.