Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 4;9:1356. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01356

Table 3.

Summary of morphological findings in renal allografts.

Groups Animal# pod Histology
Overall histological interpretation
i score t score v score g score ptc score c3d staining IgG staining
C3H-Balb/c, nonprimed 1 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 Minimal IgG staining without evidence of rejection
2 5 3 0 0 0 0 1 Minimal IgG staining without evidence of rejection
3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 Negative Nonspecific changes
4 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 Negative Nonspecific changes

C3H-Balb/c, primed-3d 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Negative Nonspecific changes
6 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 Minimal IgG staining without evidence of rejection
7 5 1 0 0 0 2 2 Minimal Active AMR
8 8 3 1 0 0 0 1 Focal CMR (borderline changes) mixed with active AMR
9 13 2 1 0 1 1 3 Focal Active AMR mixed with CMR (borderline changes)

C3H-Balb/c, primed-4d 10 3 0 1 0 0 2 2 Minimal Active AMR mixed with CMR (borderline changes)
11 5 1 0 0 1 2 2 Minimal Active AMR
12 5 1 0 0 1 3 3 Minimal Active AMR
13 7 1 1 0 1 3 1 Focal Active AMR mixed with CMR (borderline changes)
14 8 0 0 0 1 3 2 Focal Active AMR

C3H-Balb/c, primed-7d 15 3 0 0 0 2 1 2 Minimal Active AMR
16 6 1 0 0 2 2 3 Focal Active AMR
17 6 1 0 0 1 1 2 Minimal Active AMR
18 5 0 1 0 3 1 3 Diffuse Diffuse ATN
19 5 1 1 0 2 3 3 Diffuse Active AMR
20 5 1 1 1 3 2 3 Diffuse Diffuse ATN

C57BL/6-Balb/c, primed 21 5 2 0 0 1 0 1 Minimal Active AMR
22 15 2 0 0 3 0 2 Focal Active AMR

C57BL/6-Balb/c, skin Tx 23 21 1 1 0 1 0 1 Minimal CMR (borderline change) mixed with active AMR
24 35 3 2 0 1 0 2 Focal CMR IA mixed with active AMR
25 35 3 2 0 0 1 2 Focal CMR IA mixed with active AMR

Histological changes were evaluated based on the Banff 2015 lesion grading system and classification categories: 0, absent; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, prominent.

pod, days after kidney transplantation; Tx, transplantation; ATN, acute tubular necrosis; AMR, antibody-mediated rejection; CMR, cell-mediated rejection.