Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 4;9:934. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00934

Table 8.

Potential QTLs for dormancy and WH identified in a pseudo-testcross F1 population (3010 × CW 1010) using phenotypic data generated across two environments (JPC and BVL).

Trait Parent QTL code Chr. Year Peak marker Peak LOD R2 Allele dir. LSI (cM) Flanking markers
FD 3010 dorm24 3A $4 TP67563 5.4 0.09 (−) 49.4–51.8 TP71671–TP76041
FD 3010 dorm25 3D $4 MRG_38650252 3.6 0.09 (−) 70.1–74.4 MRG_31477229–TP57603
FD 3010 dorm26 3D $2 TP16817 4.3 0.09 (−) 76.3–79.5 TP16817–TP5092
FD 3010 dorm27 1C $1 TP32721 4.8 0.07 (−) 81.8–85.1 TP32721–TP40620
FD 3010 dorm28 1A $3 TP46942 3.6 0.06 (−) 72–73 TP72089–TP73780
FD CW 1010 ndorm16 4D $3 TP69818 3.1 0.09 (+) 8.3–10.7 TP69818–TP82286
FD CW 1010 ndorm17 4D $2 TP80681 3.9 0.08 (+) 19.7–23.5 TP80681–TP83595
WH 3010 wh17 4C ϕ1 TP81375 4.6 0.10 (+) 37.6–39.5 TP80478–TP81375
WH 3010 wh18 3D ϕ3 TP43991 5.1 0.09 (+) 58.9-63.2 TP50808–TP87713
WH 3010 wh19 7A ϕ3 TP71458 3.7 0.06 (+) 50.5–52 TP15177–TP71458

Across environment dormancy:

$1 = 2015, fall; $2 = 2016, fall; $3 = 2016, winter; $4 = 2017, winter.

Across environment winter hardiness:

ϕ1 = 2015; ϕ2 = 2016; ϕ3 = 2017.

Chr., Chromosome; Dir., Direction; LSI, 1-LOD support interval in cM unit.