Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun;20(1):93–105.

Table 1.

Characteristics of 42 amparo claims decided by Uruguayan circuits of appeal in 2015

Categories Number of successful claims (n=31) (% of successful claims) Number of unsuccessful claims (n=11) (% of unsuccessful claims)
Essentiality • In WHO’s 2017 Model List of Essential Medicines 2 (6%) 1 (9%)
• In the National Medicines Formulary (FTM) for any indication 5 (16%) 2 (18%)
Indications • Oncological diseases 20 (65%) 9 (82%)
• Unspecified indication(s) 6 (19%) 0
• Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (degenerative lung disease) 2 (6%) 1 (9%)
• Nephrotic syndrome 1 (3%) 0
• Lupus 0 1 (9%)
• Inflammatory bowel disease 1 (3%) 0
• Multiple sclerosis 1 (3%) 0
Human rights • Right to life 30 (97%) 3 (27%)
recognized in the • Right to an adequate standard of living and health 1 (3%) 0
court decisions • Right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health 28 (90%) 3 (27%)
• Right to freedom from discrimination 29 (94%) 3 (27%)
• Right to equality before the law 17 (55%) 0
• No explicit rights 0 6 (55%)
International law • International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 18 (55%) 2 (18%)
recognized in the • American Convention on Human Rights 18 (55%) 2 (18%)
court decisions • Universal Declaration of Human Rights 12 (36%) 0
• Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights 12 (36%) 1 (9%)
• None 10 (30%) 9 (82%)