Table 4.
Evaluation and student satisfaction (“n”=102 students)
| Questions | Answers | Questions | Answers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Was motivation (stimulus, orientation and induction of goal-directed behavior) provided by the teaching methodology used adequate for understanding? | Every time 55 | 9. Were goals achieved? | Yes 97 |
| Most times 44 | Partially 5 | ||
| Sometimes 3 | No 0 | ||
| Never 0 | |||
| 2. Have the main ideas been revisited, clarified, or completed when necessary? | Every time 78 | 10. Was the teaching material relevant to improve content learning? | Yes 96 |
| Most times 22 | Partially 6 | ||
| Sometimes 2 | No 0 | ||
| Never 0 | |||
| 3. Were the examples illustrative, relevant and adjusted to the proposed subject matters? | Every time 79 | 11. Were the visual aids used properly? | Yes 92 |
| Most times 22 | Partially 10 | ||
| Sometimes 1 | No 0 | ||
| Never 0 | |||
| 4. Has the teacher demonstrated an adequate domain of the subject matters covered? | Every time 96 | 12. Has the content changed paradigms (representing a pattern to be followed) for a good medical practice? | Yes 97 |
| Most times 6 | Partially 4 | ||
| Sometimes 0 | No 1 | ||
| Never 0 | |||
| 5. Was there a sequence in themes development to improve students learning? | Every time 69 | 13. Was learning important for a future professional life if you practice family medicine or specialty or related? | Yes 96 |
| Most times 29 | Partially 4 | ||
| Sometimes 4 | No 0 | ||
| Never 0 | Not applicable (specialty or related) 2 | ||
| 6. How deep were the subject matters developed? | Optimal 73 | 14. Has the content brought new relevant knowledge to good medical practice? | Many 93 |
| Very Good 25 | Some 9 | ||
| Good 4 | None 0 | ||
| Bad 0 | |||
| 7. Were the teaching techniques adequate to the proposed objectives? | Every time 55 | 15. Was the content adequate for the purpose of general practitioner training? | Yes 94 |
| Most times 40 | Partially 7 | ||
| Sometimes 7 | No, focused on the training of the gynecology and obstetrical doctor 1 | ||
| Never 0 | |||
| 8. Did the classes meet your expectations? | Exceeded 43 | 16. The time spent with classes was ... | Enough for content learning, the time being adequate 70 |
| Corresponded properly 55 | Little for learning the content, requiring more hours, therefore the pace could have been slower 8 | ||
| Partially corresponded 3 | Some with enough time and others with little time for learning 9 | ||
| Did not match 1 | Exceeded the requirements of the content, wasting time, therefore the pace could have been faster 12 | ||
| I cannot evaluate 3 |