Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 28;7:243. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.13694.1

Box 2. WHO–UMC causality categories.

Causality term Assessment criteria
Certain Event or laboratory test abnormality, with plausible time relationship to drug intake
• Cannot be explained by disease or other drugs
• Response to withdrawal plausible (pharmacologically, pathologically)
• Event definitive pharmacologically or phenomenologically (i.e. an objective and specific medical disorder or a
recognised pharmacological phenomenon)
• Rechallenge satisfactory, if necessary
Probable/
Likely
Event or laboratory test abnormality, with reasonable time relationship to drug intake, Unlikely to be attributed to
disease or other drugs
• Response to withdrawal clinically reasonable
•Rechallenge not required
Possible • Event or laboratory test abnormality, with reasonable time relationship to drug intake
• Could also be explained by disease or other drugs
• Information on drug withdrawal may be lacking or unclear
Unlikely Event or laboratory test abnormality, with a time to drug intake that makes a relationship improbable (but not
impossible)
• Disease or other drugs provide plausible explanations
Conditional/
Unclassified
• Event or laboratory test abnormality
• More data for proper assessment needed, or
• Additional data under examination
Unassessable/
Unclassifiable
• Report suggesting an adverse reaction
• Cannot be judged because information is insufficient or Contradictory
• Data cannot be supplemented or verified

Reference The Uppsala Monitoring Center. The use of the WHO-UMC system for standardised case causality assessment. Reproduced with permission of Uppsala monitoring centre. Available at https://www.who-umc.org/media/2768/standardised-case-causality-assessment.pdf