Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Jun 2;91:57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.06.001

Table 2.

Studies evaluating use (feasibility, reliability, or validity) of quality measures applicable to OUD.

Article Measure Setting Primary outcome Results Specific to OUD?
Garnick, Lee, Chalk, et al., 2002 HEDIS initiation and engagement Administrative data among commercial MCOs Feasibility among adult enrollees Use of measures is feasible, meaningful, and informative. Initiation rates ranged from 26%–46%; Engagement rates were more consistent with a range of 14% to 29% No
Harris, Reeder, Ellerbe, & Bowe, 2011 HEDIS initiation and engagement VHA Validity of measure to correctly identify SUD treatment services through diagnosis and procedure codes Concordance with chart review in specialty settings was high (range 92% to 98%). Concordance with chart review in non-specialty settings varied from 46% to 63%). No
Garnick, Lee, Horgan, et al., 2011 HEDIS initiation and engagement Case studies of five states Feasibility and implementation Measures can be satisfactorily implemented but with mixed implications for other states. Measures reflect necessary but insufficient steps for full recovery. No
Kim, Saitz, Cheng, et al., 2011 HEDIS initiation and engagement RCT in primary care settings Feasibility of initiation and engagement criteria under a chronic medical disorder model Feasible in primary care with initiation and engagement rates of 45% and 23% No
Thomas, Garnick, Horgan, et al., 2013 HEDIS initiation and engagement National data from private health plans, VHA, and Medicaid Feasibility of expanded measure specifications to include receipt of MAT as a qualifying service MAT as a qualifying AOD service is feasible across systems but varies widely depending on measure specification Yes
Harris et al., 2015 HEDIS initiation and engagement VHA Specification validity High concordance for residential and outpatient AOD programs (90% and 96%). Concordance in non-addiction settings ranged from 59% to 93%. No
Mattke, Predmore, Sloss, Wilks, & Watkins, 2017 HEDIS initiation and engagement Commercial health plan claims Feasibility of expanded measure specifications to include receipt of MAT as a qualifying AOD service Including MAT was feasible and increased initiation rates by 2.4% (from 38.9% to 39.8%) and engagement rates by 9.9% (from 12.9% to 14%) Yes

VHA = Veterans Health Administration; MAT = Medication assisted treatment; RCT = Randomized Controlled Trial; AOD = Alcohol or other drug.