Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018 May 11;37(7):1956–1968. doi: 10.1002/etc.4141

Table 2.

Predicted release rate constants and equilibrium concentrations of copper from five types of pressure treated lumber blocks as a function of salinity based on a non-linear first-order model. Salinity is expressed as parts per thousand (‰).

Treatment Salinity (‰) Copper release rate constant (1/d) Significance groupinga Equilibrium concentration (mg/L) Significance groupinga
MCA low 0 2.71 ± 1.13 A 1.68 ± 0.76 NS
1 0.79 ± 0.15 B 3.15 ± 1.86
10 0.29 ± 0.09 B 4.25 ±1.10
30 0.44 ± 0.12 B 3.94 ± 0.83
MCA high 0 1.82 ± 1.49 NS 4.47 ± 1.96 B
1 0.57 ± 0.07 9.48 ± 1.25 A
10 0.32 ± 0.11 8.31 ± 0.97 AB
30 0.58 ± 0.17 5.22 ± 2.49 AB
CCA 0 1.66 ± 0.27 A 4.12 ± 0.50 A
1 0.33 ± 0.05 B 12.0 ± 0.15 A
10 0.09 ± 0.04 B 16.0 ± 2.62 A
30 0.03 ± 0.03 B 1400 ± 2400b A
ACQ low 0 0.57 ± 0.24 NS 1.00 ± 0.25 B
1 0.49 ± 0.43 1.24 ± 0.72 B
10 0.49 ± 0.12 2.31 ± 0.13 A
30 0.53 ± 0.06 0.59 ± 0.04 B
ACQ high 0 0.78 ± 0.29 NS 9.09 ± 6.17 A
1 0.73 ± 0.31 11.6 ± 5.22 A
10 0.37 ± 0.02 19.2 ± 5.44 A
30 0.28 ± 0.10 14.4 ± 2.24 A

NS = not a statistically significant difference between salinities within a treatment.

a Different letters denote significant differences between salinities with a treatment. Treatments sharing two letters (e.g., ‘AB’) are not different from either salinities ‘A’ or ‘B’.

b Poor model fitting.