Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 11.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ Rev. 2018 Jun;108(6):1468–1487. doi: 10.1257/aer.20170765

Table 2.

Effects of bracero exclusion on domestic seasonal agricultural employment: Differences-in-differences with continuous treatment, monthly

Specification: All states, all years All states, years 1960–1970 Exposed states only, all years



linear ln linear ln linear ln
It1965·¯s1955
−6949.2 −0.311 −1843.0 −0.113 −312.2 −0.142
(9093.5) (0.509) (6859.3) (0.375) (7463.0) (0.566)

N 10329 6386 6072 3707 5168 3189
adj. R2 0.055 0.085 0.079 0.076 0.028 0.053
Clusters 46 46 46 46 23 23

Dep. var.: Domestic seasonal workers. ‘Treatment’ is the degree of exposure to exclusion. Observations are state-months. All regressions include state and month-by-year fixed effects. Standard errors clustered by state in parentheses. ℓ̄1955 is average fraction of Mexicans among the state’s total hired seasonal workers across the months of 1955. Covers only January 1954 to July 1973, as in original sources. Farm worker stocks missing in original sources for 1955 in Rhode Island and New Hampshire. If no workers reported for state-month in a month when source report was issued, assume zero. ‘Exposed states’ means states with nonzero bracero stocks in 1955 (i.e., only the ‘high’ and ‘low’ groups in the figures).