Table 3.
Randomized Controlled Trials of Geriatric Assessment Underway
Study | Design | Population | Intervention Delivery | Management Strategy | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hurria et al. -City of Hope |
2:1 Patient randomization n=600 |
age 65+ with any stage solid tumor malignancies starting a new chemo regimen (any line) | Study NP in collaboration with the primary oncologist and clinic nurse | Established protocol for referral to the multidisciplinary team based on multidisciplinary team input and triggers based on GA results | 4 Primary endpoints: Chemo toxicity (Gr3+); Rate of hospitalization; change in functional status; change in psychosocial status |
Soubeyran et al.35 -28 Regional Coordination Units for Geriatric Oncology (mix of sites) |
Patient randomization n=1200 |
age 70+ with most solid tumor malignancies candidate for first/second line medical treatment | Geriatrician with nurse follow up | Established protocol based on expert input | Co-primary endpoint of overall survival and dimensions of QoL; Response; PFS; other QoL; chemo tox, health care utilization |
Puts et al. -multi-center study of centers in Canada |
Patient randomization n=350 |
aged 70+ with most solid tumor malignancies starting first/second line chemotherapy | Geriatric oncology with nurse follow up | Established protocol based on Delphi consensus and guidelines |
QoL; Cost-effectiveness; Function; Chemo tox; Satisfaction; Cancer tx changes; Survival |
Mohile et al. -community oncology practices affiliated with University of Rochester NCORP Research Base |
Cluster randomization by oncology practice GAP n=700 COACH n=528 |
aged 70+ with advanced solid tumor malignancies | GA summary results and recommendation given to oncology team | Established protocol based on Delphi consensus panel and guidelines | GAP: chemo toxicity (Gr3+), survival, function COACH: communication, satisfaction, patient and caregiver QoL; health care utilization |