Table 1.

A summary of the clinical cases. The number of sonications performed, the peak temperature achieved, the peak applied acoustic power, peak acoustic energy, the maximum sonication duration, and the calculated energy efficiency correlation are listed along with their respective P‐value. Patients with nonsignificant (P > 0.05) power efficiency correlation coefficient are marked with an asterisk (*)

Patient	Number of sonications	Sonications included in analysis	Peak temperature	Peak power (W)	Peak energy (J)	Maximum duration (s)	Energy efficiency pearson correlation coefficient
1*	13	11/13	54.2	350	4563	13	−0.86 (P = 0.06)
2	15	15/15	51.7	800	19152	24	−0.76 (P = 0.01)
3	13	12/13	51.3	600	14388	24	−0.94 (P < 0.01)
4	16	14/16	48.2	800	19176	24	−0.96 (P < 0.01)
5	10	10/10	52.3	350	8400	24	−1.00 (P < 0.01)
6	9	9/9	48.4	900	24327	27	−0.95 (P < 0.01)
7	11	11/11	52.3	565	11000	20	−0.97 (P < 0.01)
8	12	12/12	53.2	600	14352	24	−0.97 (P < 0.01)
9	13	13/13	52.0	700	16764	24	−0.85 (P < 0.01)
10	14	13/14	50.1	640	22470	35	−0.92 (P < 0.01)
11	13	11/13	52.1	600	12000	20	−0.98 (P < 0.01)
12	13	12/13	49.9	800	24986	31	−0.95 (P < 0.01)
13	10	8/10	51.8	500	13486	27	−0.97 (P < 0.01)
14	11	9/10	51.0	550	11040	20	−0.96 (P < 0.01)
15	16	15/16	48.4	900	35256	39	−0.85 (P < 0.01)
16	17	17/17	49.6	700	27907	43	−0.91 (P < 0.01)
17	17	15/17	47.7	750	32422	43	−0.73 (P < 0.01)
18	10	9/10	48.5	550	19337	35	−0.94 (P < 0.01)
19	16	10/16	47.4	600	24940	43	−0.90 (P < 0.01)