Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2018 Jan 11;190:94–106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.021

Table 4.

Hierarchical multiple linear regression model for the dual conflict effect in PD.

coefficients model statistics power
B β t p R2 Δ
R2
Δ F sig.

Δ F
Model
Fit F
Model

Fit p
1−β
step 1 model .06 .06. 8.28 .005 8.28 .005 .83
  constant .00 .00 1.000
  age .24 .24 2.88 .005
step 2 model .12 .06 3.09 .029 4.49 .002 .94
  constant .00 .00 1.000
  age .17 .17 1.99 .049
  caudate DVR −.17 −.17 −1.97 .051
  thalamic k3 .00 .00 .01 .989
  cortical k3 −.16 −.16 −1.52 .131
step 3 model .15 .03 4.69 .032 4.63 .001 .97
  constant −.05 −.56 .574
  age .15 .15 1.81 .073
  caudate DVR −.24 −.24 −2.60 .010
  thalamic k3 .01 .01 .07 .943
  cortical k3 −.14 −.14 −1.35 .180
  caudate DVR * cortical k3 .18 .19 2.17 .032

(N = 135, all PD patients with both the DTBZ and PMP PET measures). All variables standardized before being entered in the model. B, unstandardized coefficient; β, standardized coefficient.

**

indicates p < .0005