Skip to main content
. 2018 May 31;24(4):703–710. doi: 10.1007/s12298-018-0553-0

Table 2.

Effect of different inoculation and co-cultivation media on Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Petunia hybrida

Inoculation and co-cultivation media Kanamycin-resistant plantlet (%) No. of PCR- positive plantletd No. of GUS-positive plantlete Transformation efficiency (%)f
Alb LF Alc Al LF Al Al LF Al Al LF Al
Medium 1: MS full strength 5.00 ± 1.00d 4.00 ± 1.60c 2/5 1/4 0/5 0/4 0.00 ± 0.00d 0.00 ± 0.00c
Medium 2: MS—(KH2PO4, NH4NO3, KNO3)a 12.00 ± 1.90c 9.00 ± 1.30b,c 9/12 6/9 7/12 4/9 7.00 ± 1.80c 4.00 ± 1.50b
Medium 3: MS—(KH2PO4, NH4NO3, KNO3, CaCl2) 30.00 ± 2.00a 25.00 ± 1.90a 28/30 21/25 22/30 16/25 22.00 ± 2.30a 16.00 ± 2.50a
Medium 4: No MS elements and vitamins only distilled water, sucrose and agar 20.00 ± 1.95b 13.00 ± 1.60b 16/20 10/13 13/20 8/13 13.00 ± 2.00b 8.00 ± 1.60b

In each treatment, 100 leaf explants from each cultivar were inoculated and the experiment was repeated five times. The data were collected as a mean of five replications ± standard error

Various letters shows significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 (n = 5)

aThe elements inside the bracket were removed from MS medium

bAlvan cultivar

cLF Alvan cultivar

dThe number of putative transgenic plantlets with positive PCR responses/The number of putative transgenic plantlets (kanamycin resistance)

eThe number of GUS-positive plantlets was obtained from the number of kanamycin resistant plantlets

fGUS-positive plantlets were used for investigation of percentage of transformation efficiency from 100 explants