. 2018 Jul 11;8:10433. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28604-6

Table 5.

Performance of the arm TLS GTF and p-ITFs in subjects associated with low, middle, and high PP amplification.

Testing (N = 114)	Low (1.02–1.30)				Middle (1.31–1.38)				High (1.38–1.58)
Testing (N = 114)	RMSE	SP Error	PP Error	Norm	RMSE	SP Error	PP Error	Norm	RMSE	SP Error	PP Error	Norm
Arm TLS GTF	3.77	4.67	5.15	6.96	2.94	2.22	2.15	3.09	2.80	2.91	3.46	4.52
p-ITF₁	2.32^*	2.85^*	3.99	4.90^*	1.84^*	1.24^*	1.96	2.32	1.77^*	1.30^*	2.02^*	2.41^*
p-ITF₂	2.42^*	2.51^*	3.78	4.54^*	2.01^*	1.64^*	2.65	3.12	1.99^*	0.94^*	1.71^*	1.95^*

Errors are root-mean-squared across all subjects. SP: systolic pressure. PP: pulse pressure. Norm: Euclidean norm of SP and PP errors. ^*Significantly difference from the arm TLS GTF (p < 0.05 with Holms-Bonferroni correction).