Table II.

Methodological quality assessment of included studies based on Coleman Methodology Scoring.28

Study	Criteria
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	Score	Scores (%)
Sfondrini et al. 200430	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	7/10	70
Cacciafesta et al. 200424	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	7/10	70
Krishnaswamy et al. 200720	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	7/10	70
Elekdag-Turk et al. 200831	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	7/10	70
Koupis et al. 200832	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	7/10	70
Varlik et al. 200921	Yes	Yes	No	No	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	6/10	60
Campoy et al. 201033	Yes	Yes	No	No	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	6/10	60
ROMANO et al. 20124	Yes	No	Yes	No	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	6/10	60
ROMANO et al. 2012b34	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	7/10	70
Hammad et al. 201335	Yes	Yes	No	No	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	6/10	60
Bovali et al. 201422	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	8/10	80
Jung 201437	Yes	No	Yes	No	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	6/10	60
Menini et al. 201423	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	7/10	70
Ozer et al. 201437	Yes	Yes	No	No	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	6/10	60
Vijayakumar et al. 201438	Yes	No	No	No	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	5/10	50
Bazargani et al. 201627	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	9/10	90
Roelofs et al. 20171	Yes	No	No	No	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	5/10	50

N/A: Not applicable.