Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 7;392(10141):41–50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31308-4

Table 2.

Outcomes at 15 months

Usual care group (N=749) Intervention group (N=797) Adjusted difference in means (95% CI); p value
Primary outcome*
Unadjusted mean EQ-5D-5L (SE) 0·504 (0·012) 0·533 (0·012) 0·00 (−0·02 to 0·02); p=0·93
Secondary outcomes
Illness burden
Self-rated health of good or better 230/631 (36%) 242/642 (38%) 0·84§ (0·67 to 1·05); p=0·13
Mean Bayliss measure of illness burden16 18·4 (12·9); n=590 16·7 (11·6); n=598 −0·64 (−1·54 to 0·27); p=0·17
Mean HADS anxiety score17 6·3 (4·8); n=624 5·8 (4·7); n=629 −0·24 (−0·57 to 0·08); p=0·15
Mean HADS depression score17 6·8 (4·6); n=625 6·1 (4·6); n=630 −0·01 (−0·33 to 0·30); p=0·94
Treatment burden
Mean Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire score18 15·0 (17·1); n=626 12·9 (15·0); n=625 −0·46 (−1·78 to 0·86); p=0·49
Mean eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Score19 6·6 (1·3); n=749 6·7 (1·2); n=797 0·06 (−0·05 to 0·17); p=0·27
Median number of different drugs prescribed in past 3 months 11·0 (8·0–15·0); n=736 11·0 (8·0–15·0); n=774 1·02 (0·97 to 1·06); p=0·46
Patient-centred care
Mean PACIC score20 2·5 (0·9); n=512 2·8 (1·0); n=524 0·29 (0·16 to 0·41); p<0·0001
Mean CARE doctor score21 37·5 (10·0); n=601 40·2 (9·7); n=617 1·20 (0·28 to 2·13); p=0·0109
Mean CARE nurse score21 38·5 (9·5); n=462 40·8 (8·9); n=535 1·11 (0·03 to 2·19); p=0·044
Patients reporting they almost always discuss the problems most important to them in managing their own health 153/599 (26%) 256/612 (42%) 1·85§ (1·44 to 2·38); p<0·0001
Patients reporting that support and care is almost always joined-up 173/603 (29%) 257/614 (42%) 1·48§ (1·18 to 1·85); p=0·0006
Patients reporting being very satisfied with care 236/608 (39%) 345/614 (56%) 1·57§ (1·19 to 2·08); p=0·0014
Patients reporting having a written care plan, health plan, or treatment plan** 91/623 (15%) 141/623 (23%) 1·97†† (1·32 to 2·95); p=0·0010

Data are n/N (%), median (IQR), or mean (SD), unless otherwise indicated; treatment effects are presented as adjusted odds ratios, beta-coefficients, or incidence rate ratios (see footnotes). Use of the Morisky Medication Adherence Score is protected by US Copyright laws. Permission for use is required. A licence agreement is available from Donald E Morisky, MMAS Research LLC, 14725 NE 20th St, Bellevue, WA 98007, USA, or from dmorisky@gmail.com. HADS=Hospital And Depression Score.

*

Means calculated with multiple imputation by chain equations.

Intracluster correlation coefficient was 0·00 (95% CI 0·00–0·00).

Ordinal variable, dichotomised for ease of presentation; full details of question and responses available in appendix.

§

Adjusted odds ratio from multi-level ordinal logistic regression.

Beta-coefficients; analyses are adjusted multi-level linear regression models.

Incidence rate ratio from adjusted multi-level Poisson regression model.

**

Not prespecified in the statistical analysis plan; responses of “don't know” were treated as not having a care plan.

††

Adjusted odds ratio from multi-level logistic regression.