Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 5;21(3):353–364. doi: 10.1177/1094670518755315

Table 2.

Correlation Matrix.a

(A) All Cases 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1. Performancet + 1 1
2. Performancet .757*** 1
3. Diversificationi,t −.236* −.216* 1
4. Firm brand breadthi,t −.106 −.055 .493*** 1
5. Brand intensityi,t .246*** .209* .051 −.073 1
6. Ln assetsi,t −.024 −.075 −.191 −.170 −.500*** 1
7. Ln costsi,t .054 .064 −.143 −.114 −.209* .457*** 1
8. Prestige ranki,t .200* .247** −.230 −.169*** −.094 .254*** .226*** 1
9. Patentsi,t .166 .190 −.071 .029 .411*** −.211** −.016 −.043
10.Trademark agei,t .276*** .318*** −.092 .431 .029** .080 .031 .137 .046

aWe report the pairwise correlation coefficients and their Bonferroni-adjusted significance.

*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.