Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 11;13:30. doi: 10.1186/s13006-018-0172-y

Table 3.

Gear strengths and gaps identified in the Becoming breastfeeding friendly pilot testing process in Ghana

Gear Strengths Gaps Recommended actions
Advocacy • Strong capacity for breastfeeding advocacy and advocates exists at highest levels of government • There is no network of advocates and thus advocacy is not coordinated
• Advocacy is not sustained
• Advocacy mainly limited to world breastfeeding week celebration
• Engage and Build capacity of media practitioners
• Promote breastfeeding through existing forums
• Actively engage and train breastfeeding champions
Political will • Political will is demonstrated by existing government initiatives
• Key government staff are influencing breastfeeding policy development
• Actions by government staff has not translated into full action for breastfeeding • Engage parliamentarians using policy briefs
• Advocate for adoption of ILO convention on maternity protection (No.183)
Legislation and policy • Strong policy and legislative environment identified (BFHI, the Code, maternity protection, etc)
• Institutions exist to implement these policies/legislation
• Gaps identified in existing legislation with respect to current WHA resolutions
• Duration of maternity leave is less than ILO minimum standard
• Code not enforced nation-wide
• Revise LI 1667 to incorporate recent WHA resolutions
• Revise penalties for LI 1667 violations
• Strengthen implementation of the code
• Facilitate adoption of at least 14 weeks maternity leave
Funding and resources • At least one fully funded position for breastfeeding coordination and monitoring at national level • No earmarked funding for breastfeeding at national or sub-national levels for government and private sector breastfeeding services • Provide adequate funding for breastfeeding programs
• Track expenditure on breastfeeding programming
Training and program Delivery • Revised curricula for pre-service training in breastfeeding
• In-service training activities has been implemented throughout the country
• Breastfeeding is integrated into various existing programs at sub-national level
• BFHI designation and implementation exists
• Revised curricula not being utilized in many training institutions
• Coverage of in-service training remains sub-optimal and poorly tracked/coordinated
• No clear definition of competence level of trainers
• BFHI coverage is low and infrequently re-assessed
• Promote use of revised pre-service training curricula
• Harmonize and Track coverage of breastfeeding capacity strengthening
• Strengthen BFHI monitoring/re-assessment process
Promotion • Several government initiatives (strategy documents) identified that aim to promote breastfeeding • Identified initiatives are not adequately funded by government
• Impact of these initiatives on awareness is sub-optimal
• Engage retired health staff to promote breastfeeding
• Provide funding for promotion activities
• Promote breastfeeding using maternity promotion platforms
Research and evaluation • Indicators exists for regular (surveys), and routine (institutional data) monitoring of breastfeeding
• BFHI/Ten Steps monitoring system exists
• Data exists for tracking progress in breastfeeding practice at national but not sub-national levels
• No data on vulnerable groups
• No tracking system for violations of maternity protection legislation
• No tracking of BCC
• Implement planned annual breastfeeding surveillance system
• Identify and track vulnerability to breastfeeding
• Decentralize monitoring of the code
• Track BCC activities
Coordination, goals, and monitoring • Multi-sectoral BFHI Authority coordinates implementation of BFHI at national level; BFHI monitoring decentralized
• IYCF task team provides guidance on breastfeeding policy at national level
• Committees met infrequently and on a need-to-act basis • Ensure regular meetings of coordination bodies
• Develop a workplan for action on breastfeeding