Table 4.
Variable | PCS | MCS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Levene | F/χ2(Z) | Mean ± SD | Levene | F/χ2(Z) | |
Race | 0.28 | F = 0.66 | 0.01 | F = 0.86 | ||
Han | 50.58 ± 9.19 | 41.31 ± 11.29 | ||||
Minority | 49.58 ± 10.11 | 42.71 ± 11.44 | ||||
Age(years) | 0.71 | F = 2.24 | 0.01 | F = 0.64 | ||
17~ 24 | 50.83 ± 9.47 | 41.03 ± 11.19 | ||||
25~ 34 | 50.21 ± 8.96 | 41.83 ± 11.52 | ||||
≥ 35 | 47.54 ± 8.10 | 41.82 ± 11.08 | ||||
Length of service(years) | 0.40 | F = 3.848** | 0.49 | F = 0.59 | ||
0~ 3 | 51.26 ± 9.56 | 41.12 ± 11.15 | ||||
4~ 8 | 50.44 ± 8.88 | 41.97 ± 11.29 | ||||
9~ 15 | 49.55 ± 9.06a | 40.79 ± 11.53 | ||||
≥ 16 | 46.63 ± 8.87ab | 41.60 ± 12.41 | ||||
Marital status | 1.42 | F = 2.29 | 0.15 | F = 1.40 | ||
Unmarried | 50.81 ± 9.27 | 41.50 ± 11.27 | ||||
Married, but separated | 49.17 ± 9.48 | 41.67 ± 11.15 | ||||
Married, living together | 49.62 ± 8.56 | 39.42 ± 11.91 | ||||
Education | 0.91 | F = 2.39 | 2.22 | F = 0.87 | ||
High school diploma or below | 50.04 ± 9.41 | 40.94 ± 11.35 | ||||
Some college | 50.59 ± 9.30 | 41.89 ± 11.80 | ||||
Bachelor’s degree or above | 51.71 ± 8.62 | 41.82 ± 10.44 | ||||
Residential Location | 6.62** | Z = −0.91 | 0.09 | F = 0.92 | ||
Rural area | 50.46 ± 8.90 | 41.61 ± 11.27 | ||||
City | 50.56 ± 9.83 | 40.92 ± 11.37 | ||||
Rank | 1.61 | F = 8.17** | 1.66 | F = 2.62* | ||
Soldier | 51.76 ± 9.17 | 41.85 ± 11.34 | ||||
Sergeant | 49.50 ± 9.34a | 40.84 ± 11.44 | ||||
Officer | 51.90 ± 8.57b | 42.49 ± 10.57b | ||||
Household income(yuan/month) | 1.59 | F = 0.69 | 0.76 | F = 2.92* | ||
< 2000(~ 302 US dollar) | 50.12 ± 9.64 | 40.45 ± 11.51 | ||||
2000 to 4000(~ 302 to 605 US dollar) | 50.84 ± 8.74 | 41.82 ± 10.93 | ||||
> 4000(~ 605 US dollar) | 50.63 ± 9.50 | 42.63 ± 11.64a |
Note: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; The ANOVA test was applied when variance homogeneity was satisfied (F-measure); non parametric rank test was applied when missing variance (Z-measure or Chi square value)
aMean values were significantly different from those of the first group (p < 0.05)
bMean values were significantly different from those of the second group (p < 0.05)