Table 1.
Summary statistics for the genetic diversity of nine Russian cattle breeds
| Breed abbreviation | n | AR | HO (± 0.001) | HE (± 0.001) | Ne0 (β1) | FIS [95% CI] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEST | 26 | 1.956 ± 0.001 | 0.357 | 0.359 | 161 ± 5 (10) | 0.004 [0.002; 0.006] |
| BLWT | 21 | 1.949 ± 0.001 | 0.341 | 0.355 | 115 ± 6 (10) | 0.036 [0.034; 0.039] |
| KALM | 14 | 1.959 ± 0.001 | 0.363 | 0.360 | 115 ± 13 (21) | − 0.006 [− 0.009; − 0.003] |
| KHLM | 25 | 1.923 ± 0.001 | 0.350 | 0.340 | 65 ± 2 (6) | − 0.028 [− 0.030; − 0.026] |
| KSTR | 20 | 1.918 ± 0.001 | 0.342 | 0.337 | 88 ± 2 (7) | − 0.013 [− 0.015; − 0.011] |
| RGBT | 23 | 1.925 ± 0.001 | 0.338 | 0.336 | 63 ± 2 (5) | − 0.006 [− 0.008; − 0.003] |
| SKSN | 20 | 1.953 ± 0.001 | 0.366 | 0.360 | 75 ± 3 (9) | − 0.018 [− 0.018; − 0.014] |
| YAKT | 25 | 1.780 ± 0.002 | 0.279 | 0.278 | 64 ± 2 (3) | − 0.003 [− 0.005; − 0.001] |
| YRSL | 21 | 1.927 ± 0.001 | 0.337 | 0.340 | 99 ± 3 (5) | 0.007 [0.007; 0.009] |
AR, rarified allelic richness; HO, observed heterozygosity; HE, unbiased expected heterozygosity; Ne0, current effective population size inferred as the intercept and related standard error as well as the slope of the regression (β1); FIS, inbreeding coefficient; CI, confidence interval (threshold values are showed in square brackets); for the full definitions of breeds (see Additional file 1: Table S1)