Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2017 Jun 19;30(5):594–609. doi: 10.1037/pas0000505

Table 3. Summary of Model Fit Tests of the Circular Correlational Structure of the CSIP.

Model Goodness-of-Fit Measures


Sample N Spacing Communality df K RMSEA RMSEA 90% CI CFI NNFI BIC
Scale Development 1,137 Equal Equal 24 12 .100 [.090; .110] .96 .95 .188
Unequal Equal 17 19 .079 [.067; .092] .98 .97 .004
Equal Unequal 17 19 .090 [.078; .102] .98 .96 .034
Validation 712 Equal Equal 24 12 .114 [.102; .128] .93 .92 .237
Unequal Equal 17 19 .083 [.067; .099] .98 .96 −.036
Equal Unequal 17 19 .093 [.077; .108] .96 .95 −.006

Note. Analyses conducted with R Package CircE (Grassi et al., 2010) using models outlined in Browne (1992). df = degrees of freedom; K = parameters; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; NNFI = Non-Normed Fit Index.