Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2017 Jun 19;30(5):594–609. doi: 10.1037/pas0000505

Table 5. Joint Analysis of the CSIP and IIP-C Scales: Rotated Component Loadings, Communalities, and Angular Locations for Component Plot.

Loadings

Factor 1 Factor 2 h2 Displacement Differencea
Domineering (PA)
 CSIP −.07 .78 .61 95.1° (90°) 5.1°
 IIP-C −.16 .78 .63 101.6° (90°) 11.6°
Self-Centered (BC)
 CSIP −.45 .56 .52 128.8° (135°) 6.2°
 IIP-C −.38 .65 .56 120.3° (135°) 14.7°
Distant (DE)
 CSIP −.70 −.02 .50 181.6° (180°) 1.6°
 IIP-C −.70 .20 .53 164.1°(180°) 15.9°
Socially Inhibited (FG)
 CSIP −.55 −.51 .56 222.8° (225°) 2.2°
 IIP-C −.63 −.52 .66 219.5° (225°) 5.5°
Nonassertive (HI)
 CSIP .05 −.78 .62 273.7° (270°) 3.7°
 IIP-C .11 −.76 .58 278.2° (270°) 8.2°
Exploitable (JK)
 CSIP .54 −.53 .58 315.5° (315°) 0.5°
 IIP-C .54 −.53 .57 315.5° (315°) 0.5°
Self-Sacrificing (LM)
 CSIP .74 .00 .54 360.0° (360°) 0.0°
 IIP-C .71 −.08 .51 353.6° (360°) 6.4°
Intrusive (NO)
 CSIP .43 .66 .62 56.9° (45°) 11.9°
 IIP-C .46 .57 .53 51.1° (45°) 6.1°
Average
 CSIP --- --- .57 --- 3.9°
 IIP-C --- --- .57 --- 8.6°

Note. N = 700.

a

Absolute difference values between observed and theoretical angular locations.