Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 12;13(7):e0200460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200460

Table 4. Associations of Mediterranean diet score (MDS) with physical functioning trajectories in women.

Cohort MDS Category Initial status Slope
Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
Coefficienta (95% CI) p-value Coefficienta (95% CI) p-value Coefficientb (95% CI) p-value Coefficientb (95% CI) p-value
CZECH REPUBLIC MDS low (1–7) Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
MDS moderate (8–10) 0.81 (-0.71, 2.34) 0.30 0.67 (-0.70, 2.04) 0.34 0.13 (-0.09, 0.35) 0.24 0.11 (-0.10, 0.33) 0.31
MDS high (11–16) 2.65 (1.08, 4.21) <0.01 2.14 (0.72, 3.57) <0.01 0.18 (-0.03, 0.39) 0.10 0.15 (-0.07, 0.36) 0.17
Continuous MDSc 0.52 (0.28, 0.76) <0.01 0.41 (0.19, 0.64) <0.01 0.03 (0.00, 0.06) 0.09 0.02 (-0.01, 0.06) 0.16
RUSSIA MDS low (1–7) Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
MDS moderate (8–10) 0.68 (-0.55, 1.91) 0.28 0.48 (-0.70, 1.66) 0.43 0.07 (-0.15, 0.29) 0.52 0.05 (-0.17, 0.27) 0.68
MDS high (11–16) 2.65 (0.99, 4.31) <0.01 2.02 (0.41, 3.62) 0.01 0.08 (-0.22, 0.38) 0.60 0.00 (-0.30, 0.30) 0.99
Continuous MDSc 0.51 (0.25, 0.78) <0.01 0.38 (0.12, 0.64) <0.01 0.00 (-0.04, 0.05) 0.90 -0.01 (-0.06, 0.04) 0.61
POLAND MDS low (1–7) Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
MDS moderate (8–10) 2.47 (0.88, 4.07) <0.01 2.25 (0.76, 3.74) <0.01 -0.15 (-0.42, 0.12) 0.27 -0.17 (-0.44, 0.10) 0.21
MDS high (11–16) 4.09 (2.39, 5.79) <0.01 3.62 (2.02, 5.23) <0.01 -0.17 (-0.45, 0.12) 0.25 -0.23 (-0.51, 0.06) 0.12
Continuous MDSc 0.68 (0.42, 0.95) <0.01 0.62 (0.37, 0.88) <0.01 -0.02 (-0.06, 0.03) 0.51 -0.03 (-0.07, 0.02) 0.24
POOLED MDS low (1–7) Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
MDS moderate (8–10) 1.24 (0.42, 2.06) <0.01 1.10 (0.33, 1.87) <0.01 0.02 (-0.13, 0.16) 0.83 0.00 (-0.14, 0.14) 0.98
MDS high (11–16) 3.08 (2.15, 4.01) <0.01 2.67 (1.80, 3.55) <0.01 0.02 (-0.13, 0.17) 0.80 -0.03 (-0.19, 0.12) 0.67
Continuous MDSc 0.58 (0.43, 0.73) <0.01 0.50 (0.36, 0.64) <0.01 0.00 (-0.02, 0.03) 0.73 -0.01 (-0.03, 0.02) 0.65

a Coefficients for the “initial status” show the difference in mean PF-10 score at baseline between the respective categories and the reference category.

b Coefficients for the “slope” indicate the difference in the mean annual PF-10 score change between the respective categories and the reference category.

c Per 1-unit increase (centered on the value 9)

Model 1: adjusted for baseline age centred at 58 years (and country cohort in case of the pooled sample)

Model 2: adjusted for baseline age centred at 58 years, smoking, marital status, education, ownership of household items, economic activity, joint/spine problem (and country cohort in case of the pooled sample)